Hepatic DNA adduct dosimetry in rats fed tamoxifen: a comparison of methods

被引:14
作者
Schild, LJ
Phillips, DH
Osborne, MR
Hewer, A
Beland, FA
Churchwell, MI
Brown, K
Gaskell, M
Wright, E
Poirier, MC
机构
[1] NCI, Carcinogen DNA Interact Sect, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
[3] Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Biochem Toxicol, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Bioctr, Canc Biomarkers & Prevent Grp, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/mutage/gei015
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Liver homogenates from rats fed tamoxifen (TAM) in the diet were shared among four different laboratories. TAM-DNA adducts were assayed by high pressure liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ES-MS/MS), TAM-DNA chemiluminescence immunoassay (TAM-DNA CIA), and P-32-postlabeling with either thin layer (P-32-P-TLC) or liquid chromatography (P-32-P-HPLC) separation. In the first study, rats were fed a diet containing 500 p.p.m. TAM for 2 months, and the values for measurements of the (E)-alpha-(deoxyguanosin-N-2-yl)-tamoxifen (dG-N-2-TAM) adduct in replicate rat livers varied by 3.5-fold when quantified using 'in house' TAM-DNA standards, or other approaches where appropriate. In the second study, rats were fed 0, 50, 250 or 500 p.p.m. TAM for 2 months, and TAM-DNA values were quantified using both 'in house' approaches as well as a newly synthesized [N-methyl-H-3]TAM-DNA standard that was shared among all the participating groups. In the second study, the total TAM-DNA adduct values varied by 2-fold, while values for the dG-N-2-TAM varied by 2.5-fold. Ratios of dG-N-2-TAM:(E)-alpha-(deoxyguanosin-N-2-yl)-N-desmethyltamoxifen (dG-N-2-N-desmethyl-TAM) in the second study were similar to 1:1 over the range of doses examined. The study demonstrated a remarkably good agreement for TAM-DNA adduct measurements among the diverse methods employed.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IARC MONOGRAPHS EVAL
[2]   Electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry and 32P-postlabeling analyses of tamoxifen-DNA adducts in humans [J].
Beland, FA ;
Churchwell, MI ;
Doerge, DR ;
Parkin, DR ;
Malejka-Giganti, D ;
Hewer, A ;
Phillips, DH ;
Carmichael, PL ;
da Costa, GG ;
Marques, MM .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (14) :1099-1104
[3]   RAPID ISOLATION, HYDROLYSIS AND CHROMATOGRAPHY OF FORMALDEHYDE-MODIFIED DNA [J].
BELAND, FA ;
FULLERTON, NF ;
HEFLICH, RH .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1984, 308 (JUN) :121-131
[4]   Major inter-species differences in the rates of O-sulphonation and O-glucuronylation of α-hydroxytamoxifen in vitro:: a metabolic disparity protecting human liver from the formation of tamoxifen-DNA adducts [J].
Boocock, DJ ;
Maggs, JL ;
Brown, K ;
White, INH ;
Park, BK .
CARCINOGENESIS, 2000, 21 (10) :1851-1858
[5]   Further characterization of the DNA adducts formed in rat liver after the administration of tamoxifen, N-desmethyltamoxifen or N,N-didesmethyltamoxifen [J].
Brown, K ;
Heydon, RT ;
Jukes, R ;
White, INH ;
Martin, EA .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1999, 20 (10) :2011-2016
[6]  
Brown Karen, 2002, Expert Opin Drug Saf, V1, P253, DOI 10.1517/14740338.1.3.253
[7]  
Carmichael PL, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P1475
[8]   Lack of evidence from HPLC 32P-post-labelling for tamoxifen-DNA adducts in the human endometrium [J].
Carmichael, PL ;
Sardar, S ;
Crooks, N ;
Neven, P ;
Van Hoof, I ;
Ugwumadu, A ;
Bourne, T ;
Tomas, E ;
Hellberg, P ;
Hewer, AJ ;
Phillips, DH .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1999, 20 (02) :339-342
[9]   DNA-DAMAGE AS ASSESSED BY P-32 POSTLABELING IN 3 RAT STRAINS EXPOSED TO DIETARY TAMOXIFEN - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CELL-PROLIFERATION AND LIVER-TUMOR FORMATION [J].
CARTHEW, P ;
RICH, KJ ;
MARTIN, EA ;
DEMATTEIS, F ;
LIM, CK ;
MANSON, MM ;
FESTING, MFW ;
WHITE, INH ;
SMITH, LL .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1995, 16 (06) :1299-1304
[10]  
Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451