Testing the monopsony-inefficiency incentive for backward integration

被引:12
作者
Azzam, A
机构
[1] Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
关键词
captive supplies; monopsony; vertical integration;
D O I
10.2307/1243276
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
In theory, monopsony at one stage in a vertically related market provides an incentive for backward integration into the adjacent competitive stages. By integrating backward, a monopsonist internalizes the monopsony inefficiency due to underemployment of the factor produced upstream. However, little is known about the importance of such incentive in practice. In this paper I provide an empirically implementable model to test the monopsony-inefficiency incentive for vertical integration. For illustration, the model is applied to the U.S. beef slaughter industry. Findings seem to support the monopsony-inefficiency incentive for backward integration by the industry into the live cattle market.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 590
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   TESTING FOR SWITCHING MARKET CONDUCT [J].
AZZAM, A ;
PARK, T .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1993, 25 (06) :795-800
[2]  
Blair RD., 1983, LAW EC VERTICAL INTE
[3]   MARKETING MARGINS AND PRICE UNCERTAINTY - THE CASE OF THE UNITED-STATES WHEAT MARKET [J].
BRORSEN, BW ;
CHAVAS, JP ;
GRANT, WR ;
SCHNAKE, LD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 67 (03) :521-528
[4]  
MAHONEY TM, 1994, 940151 U ILL URB CHA
[5]  
Perry Martin., 1989, HDB IND ORG, V1
[6]  
PERRY MK, 1978, AM ECON REV, V68, P561
[7]  
SCHMALENSEE R, 1973, J POLIT ECON, V81, P347
[8]   MEASURING MARKET POWER IN MULTIPRODUCT OLIGOPOLIES - THE UNITED-STATES MEAT INDUSTRY [J].
SCHROETER, J ;
AZZAM, A .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1990, 22 (10) :1365-1376
[9]   ESTIMATING THE DEGREE OF MARKET POWER IN THE BEEF PACKING INDUSTRY [J].
SCHROETER, JR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1988, 70 (01) :158-162
[10]   MARKDOWN PRICING AND CATTLE SUPPLY IN THE BEEF PACKING INDUSTRY [J].
STIEGERT, KW ;
AZZAM, A ;
BRORSEN, BW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 75 (03) :549-558