Meta-analysis: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in biliary colic

被引:36
作者
Colli, A. [3 ]
Conte, D. [1 ,2 ]
Della Valle, S. [1 ,2 ]
Sciola, V. [4 ]
Fraquelli, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda, Div Gastroenterol 2, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Postgrad Sch Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
[3] Osped A Manzoni, Dept Internal Med, Lecce, Italy
[4] Osped S Giuseppe, Dept Hepatol, Milan, Italy
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; DICLOFENAC; QUALITY; CHOLECYSTITIS; INDOMETHACIN; PREVENTION; MEPERIDINE; KETOROLAC; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05115.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Biliary colic is a common manifestation of cholelithiasis, developing in about one-third of patients. Even if nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have widely been used to relieve biliary pain, there is a lack of systematic review of treatments on this issue. Aim To assess the potential benefits in terms of both pain control and reduction of complications, and the potential harms of NSAIDs in patients with biliary colic. Methods Data from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing NSAIDs with no treatment, placebo or other drugs in patients with biliary colic, were collected from Medline and Embase. The outcome measures were expressed as odds ratio and relative risk and then pooled using fixed or random-effect models. Results Eleven RCTs involving 1076 subjects (268 men, 808 women; 1886 years), including 442 controls were analysed. In comparison with placebo, NSAIDs led to a significantly higher proportion of patients with complete pain relief (RR 3.77, 95%CI 1.658.61; I-2: 73%) and a significantly lower rate of complications (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.310.89; I-2: 35%). In comparison with other drugs, NSAIDs were more efficacious in controlling pain than spasmolytics (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.032.10; I-2: 55%); there was no difference between NSAIDs and opioids (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.821.33; I-2: 74%). Conclusions In patients with biliary colic NSAIDs are the first-choice treatments as they control pain with the same efficacy of opioids and significantly reduce the proportion of patients with severe complications. However, the lack of high-quality RCTs and the presence of consistent heterogeneity among studies may partially flaw these results.
引用
收藏
页码:1370 / 1378
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Treatment of biliary colic with diclofenac: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Akriviadis, EA ;
Hatzigavriel, M ;
Kapnias, D ;
Kirimlidis, J ;
Markantas, A ;
Garyfallos, A .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 113 (01) :225-231
[2]
Al-Waili N, 1998, Eur J Med Res, V3, P475
[3]
Angelico F, 1997, ITAL J GASTROENTEROL, V29, P249
[4]
[Anonymous], J SURG
[5]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[6]
[Anonymous], REV MAN REVMAN 2008
[7]
THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF GALLSTONES - THE GREPCO EXPERIENCE [J].
ATTILI, AF ;
DESANTIS, A ;
CAPRI, R ;
REPICE, AM ;
MASELLI, S .
HEPATOLOGY, 1995, 21 (03) :656-660
[8]
Basurto Ona Xavier, 2008, Gastroenterol Hepatol, V31, P1, DOI 10.1157/13114562
[9]
DICLOFENAC SODIUM IN BILIARY COLIC - A DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL [J].
BROGGINI, M ;
CORBETTA, E ;
GROSSI, E ;
BORGHI, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 288 (6423) :1042-1042
[10]
Brooks P., 1998, AM J MED, V104, p9S, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00204-0, 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00204-0]