Comparison of Current Perception Threshold Electrical Testing to Clinical Sensory Testing for Lingual Nerve Injuries

被引:26
作者
Ziccardi, Vincent B. [1 ]
Dragoo, Joel
Eliav, Eli [2 ]
Benoliel, Rafael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Diagnost Sci, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Oral Med, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVES; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; NEUROPATHY; PAIN; DIAGNOSIS; SENSATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Purpose: We performed a retrospective study of lingual nerve injury assessment comparing the techniques of current perception threshold testing versus clinical sensory testing. Patients and Methods: We designed and implemented a cross-sectional study and enrolled a patient sample with lingual nerve injuries presenting for treatment to the principal investigator. The predictor variables were clinical sensory testing modalities (ie, temperature, nocioception, vibration, 2-point discrimination, brush stroke, and von Frey monofilament perception). The primary outcome variable was the electrical current perception thresholds of the tongue dorsum (neurometer measurements at 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz). Comparisons were established with the ipsilateral affected and contralateral unaffected lingual nerve distributions. The associations between the clinical sensory testing and current perception threshold measurements were assessed using correlation coefficients, with the level of statistical significance set at P < .05. Results: A total of 40 patients (13 males and 27 females) were included in the present study. The average age of these patients was 34 years (range 13 to 66). Significant correlations were observed between the electrical stimulation thresholds at 2,000 Hz and the 2-point discrimination, reaction to brushing, reaction to vibration, and von Frey fiber thresholds, between the electrical stimulation thresholds at 250 Hz to the nociceptive and thermal thresholds, and between the electrical stimulation thresholds at 5 Hz to thermal stimuli. Conclusions: The significant correlations observed in the present study indicate that current perception threshold can be a complementary or alternative tool in the assessment and evaluation of lingual nerve injuries. (C) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70: 289-294, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Evaluation of the neurosensory deficiencies of oral and maxillofacial region following surgery [J].
Akal, UK ;
Sayan, NB ;
Aydogan, S ;
Yaman, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 29 (05) :331-336
[2]
Benoliel R, 2006, QUINTESSENCE INT, V37, P437
[3]
A METHOD OF ASSESSMENT IN CASES OF LINGUAL NERVE INJURY [J].
BLACKBURN, CW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1990, 28 (04) :238-245
[4]
Establishing a reliable protocol to measure tongue sensation [J].
Boliek, C. A. ;
Rieger, J. M. ;
Li, S. Y. Y. ;
Mohamed, Z. ;
Kickham, J. ;
Amundsen, K. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 34 (06) :433-441
[5]
Measuring sensibility of the trigeminal nerve [J].
Dellon, A. Lee ;
Andonian, Eugenia ;
DeJesus, Ramon A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (06) :1546-1550
[6]
Sensory changes in the territory of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following lower third molar extraction [J].
Eliav, E ;
Gracely, RH .
PAIN, 1998, 77 (02) :191-199
[7]
Eliav E, 2004, J OROFAC PAIN, V18, P339
[8]
Facial arthralgia and myalgia: can they be differentiated by trigeminal sensory assessment? [J].
Eliav, E ;
Teich, S ;
Nitzan, D ;
El Raziq, DA ;
Nahlieli, O ;
Tal, M ;
Gracely, RH ;
Benoliel, R .
PAIN, 2003, 104 (03) :481-490
[9]
Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain [J].
Jääskeläinen, SK ;
Teerijoki-Oksa, T ;
Forssell, H .
PAIN, 2005, 117 (03) :349-357
[10]
Jääskeläinen SK, 2004, J OROFAC PAIN, V18, P355