Grinding up wheat:: A massive loss of nucleotide diversity since domestication

被引:289
作者
Haudry, A. [1 ]
Cenci, A.
Ravel, C.
Bataillon, T.
Brunel, D.
Poncet, C.
Hochu, I.
Poirier, S.
Santoni, S.
Glemin, S.
David, J.
机构
[1] Montpellier SupAgro INRA IRD UMII, UMR Diversite Adaptat Plantes Cultivees, 2 Pl Pierre Viala, F-34060 Montpellier 1, France
[2] INRA Site Crouelle, UMR Ameliorat Sante Plantes, Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] Univ Aarhus, Bioinformat Res Ctr, Dept Genet & Ecol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] INRA, Ctr Natl Genotypage, Evry, France
[5] Univ Montpellier, Inst Sci Evolut, F-34059 Montpellier, France
关键词
wheat; domestication; nucleotide diversity; bottleneck; coalescence;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msm077
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Several demographic and selective events occurred during the domestication of wheat from the allotetraploid wild emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides). Cultivated wheat has since been affected by other historical events. We analyzed nucleotide diversity at 21 loci in a sample of 10 1 individuals representing 4 taxa corresponding to representative steps in the recent evolution of wheat (wild, domesticated, cultivated durum, and bread wheats) to unravel the evolutionary history of cultivated wheats and to quantify its impact on genetic diversity. Sequence relationships are consistent with a single domestication event and identify 2 genetically different groups of bread wheat. The wild group is not highly polymorphic, with only 212 polymorphic sites among the 21,720 bp sequenced, and, during domestication, diversity was further reduced in cultivated forms-by 69% in bread wheat and 84% in durum wheat-with considerable differences between loci, some retaining no polymorphism at all. Coalescent simulations were performed and compared with our data to estimate the intensity of the bottlenecks associated with domestication and subsequent selection. Based oil our 2 1 locus analysis, the average intensity of domestication bottleneck was estimated at about 3-giving a population size for the domesticated form about one third that of wild dicoccoides. The most severe bottleneck, with an intensity of about 6, occurred in the evolution of durum wheat. We investigated whether some of the genes departed from the empirical distribution of most loci, suggesting that they might have been selected during domestication or breeding. We detected a departure from the null model of demographic bottleneck for the hypothetical gene HgA. However, the atypical pattern of polymorphism at this locus might reveal selection on the linked locus Gsp/A, which may affect grain softness-an important trait for end-use quality in wheat.
引用
收藏
页码:1506 / 1517
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Cladistics, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1096-0031.1989.TB00562.X
[2]  
Bar-Yosef O, 1998, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V6, P159, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<159::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-7
[4]  
BELKHIR K, 2004, GENETIX 4 05 LOGICI
[5]  
Buckler ES, 2001, GENET RES, V77, P213, DOI 10.1017/S0016672301005158
[6]   Extreme population-dependent linkage disequilibrium detected in an inbreeding plant species, Hordeum vulgare [J].
Caldwell, KS ;
Russell, J ;
Langridge, P ;
Powell, W .
GENETICS, 2006, 172 (01) :557-567
[7]   Sequence polymorphism in polyploid wheat and their D-genome diploid ancestor [J].
Caldwell, KS ;
Dvorak, J ;
Lagudah, ES ;
Akhunov, E ;
Luo, MC ;
Wolters, P ;
Powell, W .
GENETICS, 2004, 167 (02) :941-947
[8]   Molecular basis of evolutionary events that shaped the hardness locus in diploid and polyploid wheat species (Triticum and aegilops) [J].
Chantret, N ;
Salse, J ;
Sabot, F ;
Rahman, S ;
Bellec, A ;
Laubin, B ;
Dubois, I ;
Dossat, C ;
Sourdille, P ;
Joudrier, P ;
Gautier, MF ;
Cattolico, L ;
Beckert, M ;
Aubourg, S ;
Weissenbach, J ;
Caboche, M ;
Bernard, M ;
Leroy, P ;
Chalhoub, B .
PLANT CELL, 2005, 17 (04) :1033-1045
[9]  
CHARLESWORTH D, 1995, EVOLUTION, V49, P911, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02326.x, 10.2307/2410413]
[10]   Breeding systems and genome evolution [J].
Charlesworth, D ;
Wright, SI .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 11 (06) :685-690