Women's understanding of a "normal smear test result": experimental questionnaire based study

被引:41
作者
Marteau, TM [1 ]
Senior, V
Sasieni, P
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Psychol & Genet Res Grp, London SE1 9RT, England
[2] Imperial Canc Res Fund, Math Stat & Epidemiol Lab, London WC1A 3PX, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.322.7285.526
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives To describe women's understanding of a negative smear test result when presented using the term "normal smear result," as required by the NHS cervical screening programme, and to evaluate the impact on understanding of different ways of presenting the residual risk inherent in such a result. Design Experimental questionnaire based study. Interventions Participants were asked to imagine that they had received a normal smear result The meaning of this result was then presented using different combinations of three different expressions of residual risk of having or developing cervical cancer over the next five years: a verbal probability of absolute risk (low risk), a numerical probability of absolute risk(1 in 5000), or a numerical probability of risk relative to an unscreened woman (five times lower). Participants: 1027 women aged 20 to 64. Results When informed only that their smear result was normal, 52% (80 of 153 women) of participants correctly understood that this entailed a residual risk of cervical cancer, compared with 70% (107 of 152) given the additional sentence explaining the meaning of a normal smear result using a verbal probability of absolute risk (difference 18%; 95% confidence interval 7% to 29%). Additionally: explaining the results using a numerical probability of absolute or relative risk did not increase the proportion who correctly understood that there was a residual risk of cervical cancer. Conclusions NHS policy for reporting normal smears needs to change to make it a definite requirement that the reporting of a "normal smear result" is accompanied by a sentence stating that this means a low risk for having or developing cervical cancer in the next five years.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 528
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SEEK PAT CONS ETH CO
[2]
AUSTOKER J, 1997, IMPROVING QUALITY WR
[3]
Brun W., 1994, SUBJECTIVE PROBABILI, P295
[4]
Communicating risk - Use of standard terms is unlikely to result in standard communication [J].
Edwards, A ;
Pill, R ;
Stott, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7070) :1483-1483
[5]
EDWARDS AGK, IN PRESS J HLTH COMM
[6]
Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study [J].
Hall, S ;
Bobrow, M ;
Marteau, TM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7232) :407-412
[7]
Marteau TM, 2000, PRENATAL DIAG, V20, P714, DOI 10.1002/1097-0223(200009)20:9<714::AID-PD906>3.0.CO
[8]
2-4
[9]
PETTICREW M, 2000, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, P4