Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin versus carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine in patients with small-cell lung cancer

被引:57
作者
Reck, M
von Pawel, J
Macha, HN
Kaukel, E
Deppermann, KM
Bonnet, R
Ulm, K
Hessler, S
Gatzemeier, U
机构
[1] Hosp Grosshansdorf, Dept Thorac Oncol, D-22927 Grosshansdorf, Germany
[2] Asklepios Hosp, Gauting, Germany
[3] Lungenklin Hemer, Hemer, Germany
[4] Allgemeines Krankenhaus Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Fachkrankenhaus Lungenheilkunde & Thoraxchirurg, Berlin, Germany
[6] Zent Klin Bad Berka, Klin Pneumol, Bad Berka, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Med Stat & Epidemiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[8] Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djg017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Paclitaxel administered in combination with a topoisomerase-II inhibitor (such as etoposide) and carboplatin is an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We conducted a randomized phase III multicenter trial to determine whether paclitaxel plus etoposide plus carboplatin improves the outcome of patients with primary SCLC relative to standard chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine). Methods: Between January 1998 and December 1999, 614 patients with SCLC stages I-IV were randomly assigned to the standard arm (309 patients) or the experimental arm (305 patients). Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. All patients were evaluated for response rate, survival, and toxicities every two courses. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 608 patients were evaluable for all endpoints (standard arm 307 patients, experimental arm 301 patients). The hazard ratio [HR] of death for patients receiving the standard treatment was statistically significantly higher than that for patients receiving the experimental treatment (HR = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 1.45; P = .024). Progression-free survival was also statistically significantly shorter for patients in the standard arm relative to that of patients in the experimental arm (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.42). There were no differences in the response rates (complete and partial combined) to the treatments (standard arm: 69.4%, 95% CI = 63.9% to 74.5%; experimental arm: 72.1%, 95% CI = 66.7% to 77.1%; difference = 2.7%, 95% C1 = 4.5% to 9.9%). Rates of severe grade of anemia, leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were lower in the experimental arm than in the standard arm. Conclusion: Patients with previously untreated SCLC who received paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin showed improved overall and progression-free survival and less frequent hematologic toxicities than those who received the standard therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1118 / 1127
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
AISNER J, 1983, CANCER TREAT REP, V67, P37
[2]  
AISNER J, 1992, SEMIN ONCOL, V19, P51
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Clinical trials: a practical approach
[4]  
[Anonymous], WHO PUBL
[5]   Dynamic Cox modelling based on fractional polynomials:: time-variations in gastric cancer prognosis [J].
Berger, U ;
Schäfer, J ;
Ulm, K .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (07) :1163-1180
[6]   CARBOPLATIN (CBDCA, JM-8) AND VP-16-213 IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED PATIENTS WITH SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
BISHOP, JF ;
RAGHAVAN, D ;
STUARTHARRIS, R ;
MORSTYN, G ;
ARONEY, R ;
KEFFORD, R ;
YUEN, K ;
LEE, J ;
GIANOUTSOS, P ;
OLVER, IN ;
ZALCBERG, J ;
BALL, D ;
BULL, C ;
FOX, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (10) :1574-1578
[7]   A CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL FOR THE MEDIAN SURVIVAL-TIME [J].
BROOKMEYER, R ;
CROWLEY, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :29-41
[8]   Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: A prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution [J].
Buccheri, G ;
Ferrigno, D ;
Tamburini, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (07) :1135-1141
[9]  
BUNN PA, 1999, P ASCO, P18
[10]   CARBOPLATIN DOSAGE - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF A SIMPLE FORMULA BASED ON RENAL-FUNCTION [J].
CALVERT, AH ;
NEWELL, DR ;
GUMBRELL, LA ;
OREILLY, S ;
BURNELL, M ;
BOXALL, FE ;
SIDDIK, ZH ;
JUDSON, IR ;
GORE, ME ;
WILTSHAW, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (11) :1748-1756