Multidimensional assessment of psychosis: A factor-analytic validation study of the routine assessment of patient progress

被引:4
作者
Ehmann, TS [1 ]
Holliday, SG
MacEwan, GW
Smith, GN
机构
[1] Riverview Hosp, Dept Psychol, Port Coquitlam, BC V3C 4J2, Canada
[2] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1053/comp.2001.16557
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The areas of function affected by major mental disorders are more diverse than the list of core symptoms assessed by many psychiatric rating scales, and the cross-sectional picture obtained in mental status interviews often fails to capture important data. Information on patient function can be obtained from measures that are based on extended observation and complement symptom-focused assessments. The Routine Assessment of Patient Progress (RAPP) is a 21-item rating scale that assesses both functional and psychiatric symptoms. It is usually completed by nursing staff who have observed patients over a 1-week period. Previous research has shown it to be reliable, valid, simple to complete, and of substantial value for patient care and diagnosis. The present study sought to examine the psychometric structure of the RAPP to define what domains of symptoms and behavior it measures. RAPP scores obtained from 165 psychotic inpatients were submitted to a factor analysis. A five-factor solution was derived in which 18 of 21 RAPP items were assigned to factors. The factors were labeled aggression, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, somatization/anxiety, and organic/disorganization. The RAPP factors were moderately correlated with conceptually similar factor scores derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). RAPP aggression scores were validated with an independent clinical measure of aggression. Patients who were independently rated as improved over their hospital stay showed significant improvement on all RAPP factors, and unimproved patients showed stability or deterioration on RAPP measures. The data indicate that RAPP factors assess domains of psychopathology that are moderately correlated with both global ratings and symptom-focused scales. The RAPP's sensitivity to change suggests it is a valid measure of treatment outcome that could be used in controlled trials, as well as standard care outcome evaluation. Copyright (C) 2007 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   The effects of clozapine on symptom clusters in treatment-refractory patients [J].
Abraham, G ;
Nair, C ;
Tracy, JI ;
Simpson, GM ;
Josiassen, RC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 17 (01) :49-53
[2]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1987, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, POSITIVE NEGATIVE SY
[4]   ROUTINE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT PROGRESS - A MULTIFORMAT, CHANGE-SENSITIVE NURSES INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSING PSYCHOTIC INPATIENTS [J].
EHMANN, TS ;
HIGGS, E ;
SMITH, GN ;
AU, T ;
ALTMAN, S ;
LLOYD, D ;
HONER, WG .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 36 (04) :289-295
[5]  
Green MF, 1996, AM J PSYCHIAT, V153, P321
[6]  
Guy W., 1976, Guy, W. (1976). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, DHEW Publ No ADM 76-338, pp 218-222., P218
[7]   Four behavioural syndromes of schizophrenia [J].
Harvey, CA ;
Curson, DA ;
Pantelis, C ;
Taylor, J ;
Barnes, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 168 (05) :562-570
[8]   NOSIE-30 - A TREATMENT-SENSITIVE WARD BEHAVIOR SCALE [J].
HONIGFEL.G ;
GILLIS, RD ;
KLETT, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1966, 19 (01) :180-&
[9]  
Kay S.R., 1991, POSITIVE NEGATIVE SY
[10]   PROFILES OF AGGRESSION AMONG PSYCHIATRIC-PATIENTS .1. NATURE AND PREVALENCE [J].
KAY, SR ;
WOLKENFELD, F ;
MURRILL, LM .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1988, 176 (09) :539-546