Fairness in public good provision: an investigation of preferences for equality and proportionality

被引:28
作者
Clark, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 1998年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/136209
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A binary public good voting mechanism is designed to test for preferences for income equality and cost/benefit proportionality. The voting design isolates preferences for equality from those for proportionality and controls for alternative external preferences such as altruism, envy, and the Rawlsian Difference Principle. Individuals choose between greater income or fairness in these demand-revealing votes. Treatments vary whether the positions of voters are earned or random, whether votes are hypothetical or real, and whether they are over gains or losses. Significant deviations from self-interested voting are observed in all treatments testing for equality and in some treatments testing for proportionality.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 729
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
ANDREONI J, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P891
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, EQUITY THEORY PSYCHO
[4]  
BALL S, 1996, UNPUB STATUS MARKETS
[5]  
BOLTON GE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1096
[6]   ULTIMATUMS, DICTATORS AND MANNERS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :209-219
[7]   Progress in behavioral game theory [J].
Camerer, CF .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (04) :167-188
[8]  
CHASE W, 1986, GEN STAT
[9]   Fairness preferences and optimization skills: are they substitutes? An experimental investigation [J].
Clark, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 34 (04) :541-557
[10]   THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY MEASURES OF VALUE [J].
COURSEY, DL ;
HOVIS, JL ;
SCHULZE, WD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (03) :679-690