C4d fixing, luminex binding antibodies - A new tool for prediction of graft failure after heart transplantation

被引:128
作者
Smith, J. D. [1 ]
Hamour, I. M. [1 ]
Banner, N. R. [1 ]
Rose, M. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Harefield Hosp, Harefield, Middx, England
关键词
anitbody mediated rejection; cardiac allograft; HLA antibodies; sensitized patients;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01991.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The standard method to detect pretransplant antibodies has been the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test of donor leukocytes. Solid phase assays to detect HLA antibodies in pretransplant serum reveal a greater number of sensitized patients, but their clinical impact is less certain. Here we have developed a method of detecting C4d fixing HLA antibodies on Luminex beads. Pretransplant serum from 565 cardiac transplant patients was retrospectively tested for the presence of HLA antibodies using CDC, HLA coated Luminex beads and C4d deposition on Luminex beads, and the results correlated with graft survival. Whereas 5/565 patients had CDC positive donor specific antibodies (DSA) before their transplant, this number was increased by 19 using Luminex beads. The 1-year survival of CDC -ve/Luminex +ve patients with DSA (n = 19) was 42% compared with 77% for CDC -ve/Luminex +ve without DSA (n = 39, p = 0.0039). Fixation of C4d (22/67 Luminex positive sera) had a negative effect on graft outcome; 1-year graft survival was, C4d +ve/DSA +ve (n = 11) 20%, C4d +ve/DSA -ve (n = 11) 91%, C4d -ve DSA +ve (n = 13) 54%, C4d -ve DSA -ve (n = 32) 75%, compared with 75% for antibody-negative patients (p = 0.0002). In conclusion, detection of Luminex +ve DSA in pretransplant serum provides a powerful negative predictor of graft survival, especially if they bind C4d.
引用
收藏
页码:2809 / 2815
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Complement causes allograft injury by cell activation rather than lysis [J].
Baldwin, WM ;
Qian, ZP ;
Wasowska, B ;
Sanfilippo, F .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (11) :1498-1499
[2]   COMPLEMENT IN ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION - CONTRIBUTIONS TO INFLAMMATION, INJURY, AND REJECTION [J].
BALDWIN, WM ;
PRUITT, SK ;
BRAUER, RB ;
DAHA, MR ;
SANFILIPPO, F .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 59 (06) :797-808
[3]   Pretransplant risk assessment in renal allograft recipients using virtual crossmatching [J].
Bielmann, D. ;
Hoenger, G. ;
Lutz, D. ;
Mihatsch, M. J. ;
Steiger, J. ;
Schaub, S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :626-632
[4]  
Böhmig GA, 2002, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V13, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V1341091
[5]  
BRAND DL, 1970, HISTOCOMPATIBILITY T, P357
[6]   Soluble HLA antigens and ELISA - A new technology for crossmatch testing [J].
Buelow, R ;
Chiang, TR ;
Monteiro, F ;
Cornejo, MC ;
Ellingson, L ;
Claas, F ;
Gaber, O ;
Gelder, F ;
Kotb, M ;
Orosz, C ;
Pouletty, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (12) :1594-1599
[7]   Detection of donor-specific antibodies using HLA-coated microspheres: another tool for kidney transplant risk stratification [J].
Gibney, Eric M. ;
Cagle, Linda R. ;
Freed, Brian ;
Warnell, Stephanie E. ;
Chan, Larry ;
Wiseman, Alexander C. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 (09) :2625-2629
[8]   ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAY FOR ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES - AN ALTERNATIVE TO PANEL STUDIES BY LYMPHOCYTOTOXICITY [J].
KAO, KJ ;
SCORNIK, JC ;
SMALL, SJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1993, 55 (01) :192-196
[9]   Human leukocyte antigen antibodies and human complement activation: Role of IgG subclass, specificity, and cytotoxic potential [J].
Kushihata, F ;
Watanabe, J ;
Mulder, A ;
Claas, F ;
Scornik, JC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (07) :995-1001
[10]   SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE CROSSMATCH TEST IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION [J].
PATEL, R ;
TERASAKI, PI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1969, 280 (14) :735-&