Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 tesla in comparison to intra-arterial DSA - Is the method suitable for diagnosis of carotid artery disease?

被引:11
作者
Oberholzer, K
Kreitner, KF
Kalden, P
Pitton, M
Requardt, M
Thelen, M
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Radiol Klin, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Siemens AG, Med Techn, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2001年 / 173卷 / 04期
关键词
MR angiography; gadolinium; mid-field equipment; digital subtraction arteriography; carotid arteries; stenosis or occlusion;
D O I
10.1055/s-2001-12476
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of three-dimensional, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid artery with a 1.0 T system in comparison to intra-arterial conventional angiography (i.a.CA) for the assessment of carotid artery disease. Method: 55 patients with suspected stenosis of the carotid artery were examined with a 3D-CE gradient-echo sequence on a 1.0T scanner (TR/TE=6.2/2.2ms) and a selective DSA i.a. angiography. Image quality was evaluated by estimating the arterial contrast and venous enhancement. Morphological pathologies were registered for all arteries, stenoses of the internal carotid artery were graded by applying the NASCET criteria. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of MRA in detecting high-grade stenosis (greater than or equal to 70%) and occlusion of the extracranial internal carotid artery were 97.7 and 94.0%. Therapeutic relevant misinterpretations were mostly based on overestimating the stenoses. Conclusion: The applied CE-MRA technique with a 1.0 T system is suitable for the assessment of carotid artery stenoses. In case of a therapeutically relevant stenosis revealed by MRA, however, verification of the diagnosis by i.a.CA is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 355
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   THE VALUE OF AORTIC-ARCH STUDY IN THE EVALUATION OF CEREBROVASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY [J].
AKERS, DL ;
MARKOWITZ, IA ;
KERSTEIN, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 154 (02) :230-232
[2]   ARTIFACTS IN MAXIMUM-INTENSITY-PROJECTION DISPLAY OF MR ANGIOGRAMS [J].
ANDERSON, CM ;
SALONER, D ;
TSURUDA, JS ;
SHAPEERO, LG ;
LEE, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (03) :623-629
[4]   PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF EXTRACRANIAL CAROTID STENOSIS - NIR ANGIOGRAPHY WITH MAXIMUM-INTENSITY PROJECTIONS AND MULTIPLANAR REFORMATION COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
DEMARCO, JK ;
NESBIT, GM ;
WESBEY, GE ;
RICHARDSON, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (05) :1205-1212
[5]   Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: Usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector [J].
Earls, JP ;
Rofsky, NM ;
DeCorato, DR ;
Krinsky, GA ;
Weinreb, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :705-710
[6]  
*EX COMM ASYMPT ST, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V273, P1432
[7]   HOW TO MEASURE CAROTID STENOSIS [J].
FOX, AJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :316-318
[8]  
HEID O, 1997, P SOC MAGNETIC RESON, V1, P254
[9]  
HEISERMAN JE, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1401
[10]   The limitations of carotid sonography: Interpretive and technology-related errors [J].
Horrow, MM ;
Stassi, J ;
Shurman, A ;
Brody, JD ;
Kirby, CL ;
Rosenberg, HK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) :189-194