Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia

被引:195
作者
Carpenter, RL
Hogan, QH
Liu, SS
Crane, B
Moore, J
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
关键词
cerebrospinal fluid volume; duration of anesthesia; lidocaine; magnetic resonance imaging; motor block; spinal anesthesia; spread of anesthesia; subarachnoid; surgical anesthesia;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199807000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Injection of local anesthetic into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) produces anesthesia of unpredictable extent and duration. Although many factors have been identified that affect the extent of spinal anesthesia, correlations are relatively poor and the extent of spread remains unpredictable. This study was designed to determine whether variability in the volume of lumbosacral CSF among individuals is a contributing factor in the variability of spinal anesthesia. Methods: Spinal anesthesia was administered to 10 healthy volunteers with 50 mg lidocaine in 7.5% dextrose. The technique was standardized to minimize variability in factors known to affect the distribution of spinal anesthesia. The extent of sensory anesthesia was assessed by pin-prick and by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Motor blockade was assessed in the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles by force dynamometry, Duration of anesthesia was assessed by pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and duration of motor blockade. Lumbosacral CSF volumes were calculated from low thoracic, lumbar, and sacral axial magnetic resonance images obtained at 8-mm increments. Volumes of CSF were correlated with measures of extent and duration of spinal anesthesia using the Kendall rank correlation test. Results Lumbosacral. CSF volumes ranged from 42.7 to 81.1 mi Volumes of CSF correlated with pin-prick assessments of peak sensory block height (P = 0.02) and duration of surgical anesthesia las assessed by the duration of tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation at the ankle (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Variability in lumbosacral CSF volume is the most important factor identified to date that contributes to the variability in the spread of spinal sensory anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   VARIATION IN SPINAL ANALGESIA WITH PLAIN BUPIVACAINE 0.5-PERCENT WHEN REPEATED IN THE SAME PATIENT [J].
ANKERMOLLER, E ;
SPANGSBERG, N ;
CHRISTENSEN, EF ;
SCHULTZ, P ;
DYRING, S ;
WERNBERG, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 35 (07) :660-663
[2]   SPINAL ANALGESIA USING BUPIVACAINE 0-5-PERCENT PLAIN - VARIATION IN THE EXTENT OF THE BLOCK WITH PATIENT AGE [J].
CAMERON, AE ;
ARNOLD, RW ;
GHORIS, MW ;
JAMIESON, V .
ANAESTHESIA, 1981, 36 (03) :318-322
[3]   CHANGES IN THE SKIN TEMPERATURE OF THE TRUNK AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SYMPATHETIC BLOCKADE DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, DP ;
CHAMBERLAIN, BDL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 65 (02) :139-143
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF EPINEPHRINE ON LIDOCAINE SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - A CROSS-OVER STUDY [J].
CHIU, AA ;
LIU, S ;
CARPENTER, RL ;
KASMAN, GS ;
POLLOCK, JE ;
NEAL, JM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (04) :735-739
[5]  
GREENE NM, 1985, ANESTH ANALG, V64, P715
[6]   Size of human lower thoracic and lumbosacral nerve roots [J].
Hogan, Q .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (01) :37-42
[7]   Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure [J].
Hogan, QH ;
Prost, R ;
Kulier, A ;
Taylor, ML ;
Liu, S ;
Mark, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (06) :1341-1349
[8]   INFLUENCE OF OBESITY ON SPINAL ANALGESIA WITH ISOBARIC 0.5-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE [J].
MCCULLOCH, WJD ;
LITTLEWOOD, DG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 58 (06) :610-614
[9]   EPINEPHRINE PROLONGS LIDOCAINE SPINAL - PAIN IN THE OPERATIVE SITE THE MOST ACCURATE METHOD OF DETERMINING LOCAL-ANESTHETIC DURATION [J].
MOORE, DC ;
CHADWICK, HS ;
READY, LB .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (03) :416-418
[10]  
Moore DC, 1982, REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, V7, P20