An Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization with Reduced Objective Computations: A Study in Differential Evolution

被引:97
作者
Bandyopadhyay, Sanghamitra [1 ]
Mukherjee, Arpan [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Stat Inst, Machine Intelligence Unit, Kolkata 700108, India
[2] Indian Stat Inst, Stat Qual Control & Operat Res Unit, Kolkata 700108, India
关键词
Correlation based ordering; differential evolution; elitism; many-objective optimization; structural optimization; NONDOMINATED SORTING APPROACH; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; REDUCTION; DESIGN; CONVERGENCE; OPTIMALITY; SET;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2014.2332878
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
140502 [人工智能];
摘要
In this paper we have developed an algorithm for many-objective optimization problems, which will work more quickly than existing ones, while offering competitive performance. The algorithm periodically reorders the objectives based on their conflict status and selects a subset of conflicting objectives for further processing. We have taken differential evolution multiobjective optimization (DEMO) as the underlying meta-heuristic evolutionary algorithm, and implemented the technique of selecting a subset of conflicting objectives using a correlation-based ordering of objectives. The resultant method is called a-DEMO, where a is a parameter determining the number of conflicting objectives to be selected. We have also proposed a new form of elitism so as to restrict the number of higher ranked solutions that are selected in the next population. The a-DEMO with the revised elitism is referred to as a-DEMO-revised. Extensive results of the five DTLZ functions show that the number of objective computations required in the proposed algorithm is much less compared to the existing algorithms, while the convergence measures are competitive or often better. Statistical significance testing is also performed. A real-life application on structural optimization of factory shed truss is demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 413
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]
Diversity Management in Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Adra, Salem F. ;
Fleming, Peter J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 15 (02) :183-195
[2]
Efficient evolutionary approach to approximate the Pareto-optimal set in multiobjective optimization, UPS-EMOA [J].
Aittokoski, T. ;
Miettinen, K. .
OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (06) :841-858
[3]
Optimization with simulation and multiobjective analysis in industrial decision-making:: A case study [J].
Alberto, I ;
Azcárate, C ;
Mallor, F ;
Mateo, PM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (02) :373-383
[4]
[Anonymous], 2007, EVOLUTIONARY ALGORIT
[5]
[Anonymous], 2002, Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Application to Industrial Problems (EUROGEN 2001)
[6]
[Anonymous], 2001, MultiObjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
[7]
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering [J].
Arias-Montano, Alfredo ;
Coello Coello, Carlos A. ;
Mezura-Montes, Efren .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2012, 16 (05) :662-694
[8]
HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Bader, Johannes ;
Zitzler, Eckart .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) :45-76
[9]
Multiobjective GAs, quantitative indices, and pattern classification [J].
Bandyopadhyay, S ;
Pal, SK ;
Aruna, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2004, 34 (05) :2088-2099
[10]
Approximation quality of the hypervolume indicator [J].
Bringmann, Karl ;
Friedrich, Tobias .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 195 :265-290