Modulation of colonic xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes by feeding bile acids: Comparative effects of cholic, deoxycholic, lithocholic and ursodeoxycholic acids

被引:22
作者
Baijal, PK [1 ]
Fitzpatrick, DW [1 ]
Bird, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Foods & Nutr, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
bile acids; colon; xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes;
D O I
10.1016/S0278-6915(98)00020-9
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Primary and secondary bile acids such as cholic (CHA), deoxycholic (DCA) and lithocholic (LCA) acids have been shown to increase colon tumorigenesis. II has been suggested that inhibition of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes such as glulathione S-transferase (GST) and UDP-glucuronyltransferase (UGT) by bile acids may be a factor in the development of colon cancer. While enzyme inhibition has been demonstrated in vitro, it is unclear whether feeding bile acids modulates colonic GST and UGT in vivo. To test this notion, male, Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 100) were assigned to a control (CON) or test diets containing 0.2% CHA, DCA, LCA or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). After 5 weeks, colonic tissue was harvested and used for enzyme and cell proliferation measurements. The response to bile acids varied with the enzyme measured and appeared isoenzyme specific. GST-cr activity was lower in the bile acid fed groups compared with CON. While GST-p was lower in the LCA-fed group, GST-pi was lower in the DCA-, CHA- and UDCA-fed groups. Unlike GST, both UGT and NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase (CYC) activities were increased by bile acids. The proliferative response of the colonic epithelium varied with the bile acids and was regionally specific. These data demonstrate that feeding bile acids alters the activity of colonic phase I and II enzymes; however, the physiological effect of these enzymatic perturbations is yet to be determined. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 607
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Phenobarbital and 3-methylcholanthrene treatment alters phase I and II enzymes and the sensitivity of the rat colon to the carcinogenic activity of azoxymethane [J].
Baijal, PK ;
Fitzpatrick, DW ;
Bird, RP .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 35 (08) :789-798
[2]   Effect of dietary protein on hepatic and extrahepatic phase I and phase II drug metabolizing enzymes [J].
Baijal, PK ;
Fitzpatrick, DW .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1996, 89 (02) :99-106
[3]  
BARTRAM HP, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P3283
[4]  
BIRD RP, 1997, COMPREHENSIVE TOXICO, V1, P677
[5]   PURIFICATION OF RAT-LIVER MICROSOMAL UDP-GLUCURONYLTRANSFERASE - SEPARATION OF 2 ENZYME FORMS INDUCIBLE BY 3-METHYLCHOLANTHRENE OR PHENOBARBITAL [J].
BOCK, KW ;
JOSTING, D ;
LILIENBLUM, W ;
PFEIL, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1979, 98 (01) :19-26
[6]  
BRUCE WR, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P4237
[7]  
COHEN AH, 1989, MODERN PATHOL, V2, P125
[8]   COMPARATIVE HEPATOTOXICITY OF CHOLIC-ACID, DEOXYCHOLIC-ACID AND LITHOCHOLIC ACID IN THE RAT - INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
DELZENNE, NM ;
CALDERON, PB ;
TAPER, HS ;
ROBERFROID, MB .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1992, 61 (2-3) :291-304
[9]   BILE-SALT STIMULATION OF COLONIC EPITHELIAL PROLIFERATION - EVIDENCE FOR INVOLVEMENT OF LIPOXYGENASE PRODUCTS [J].
DERUBERTIS, FR ;
CRAVEN, PA ;
SAITO, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1984, 74 (05) :1614-1624
[10]   ACUTE AND CHRONIC EFFECT OF DIETARY CHOLIC-ACID ON COLONIC EPITHELIAL-CELL PROLIFERATION [J].
DESCHNER, EE ;
COHEN, BI ;
RAICHT, RF .
DIGESTION, 1981, 21 (06) :290-296