When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness

被引:342
作者
Dahlin, KB
Behrens, DM
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Joseph L Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Sociol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
radical innovation; operationalization and measurement; patent citations;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.205.03.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We develop a valid definition of technological radicalness which states that a successful radical invention is: (1) novel; (2) unique; and (3) has an impact on future technology. The first two criteria allow us to identify potentially radical inventions ex ante market introduction; adding the third condition, we can ex post determine if an invention served as an important change agent. Empirically testable condition selected 6 of 581 tennis racket patents granted between 1971 and 2001. Two of the identified patents-the oversized and the wide-body rackets-are considered radical inventions by industry experts. Applying our definition and operationalization would allow researchers to achieve greater generalizability across studies, avoid endogenous definitions of radicalness, and study predictors of market success for radical inventions. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 737
页数:21
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[2]   Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Lampert, CM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (6-7) :521-543
[3]   DIRECT VALIDATION OF CITATION COUNTS AS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT PATENTS [J].
ALBERT, MB ;
AVERY, D ;
NARIN, F ;
MCALLISTER, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :251-259
[4]   TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
ANDERSON, P ;
TUSHMAN, ML .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) :604-633
[5]  
ANDREWS P, 1994, AM HERITAGE, V32
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ECONOMIST, P14
[7]  
ASHLEY S, 1993, MECH ENG, V115, P50
[8]  
ASTEBRO T, 2005, OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS R
[9]  
Carpenter M. P., 1981, WORLD PATENT INFORM, V3, P160, DOI [10.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3, DOI 10.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3]
[10]  
CHEN PJ, 1998, TECHNICAL DIRECTOR W