Perceptions of cisplatin-related toxicity among ovarian cancer patients and gynecologic oncologists

被引:21
作者
Calhoun, EA
Bennett, CL
Peeples, PA
Lurain, JR
Roland, PY
Weinstein, JM
Fishman, DA
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Policy Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gynecol Oncol Sect, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Alza Corp, Mt View, CA 94039 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1998.5189
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate issues related to chemotherapy-induced toxicities by eliciting assessments of toxicity from women with advanced stage ovarian cancer and gynecologic oncologists. Patients and methods. Fifteen ovarian cancer patients and ten gynecologic oncologists completed the survey exercises. All patients surveyed had received at least six courses of a cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen. Results. For both patients and physicians, there was good face validity to the utility exercise as assessments of health states with cisplatin were (1) consistently associated with less favorable assessments than the health state with no toxicity and (2) neurotoxicity was viewed less favorably than either ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. While the 15 patients as a group viewed health states with toxicity more favorably than physicians (P < 0.05 for each toxicity), patient assessments varied, depending on individual experiences with cisplatin. Physician assessments of toxicity were most similar to those obtained from patients who had not experienced cisplatin toxicity and were less favorable than those elicited from patients who had experienced any toxicity. Conclusions. In deciding upon therapeutic strategies, women with advanced stage ovarian cancer and treating physicians markedly differ in their assessment of the impact of specific toxicities on quality of life. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 375
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1997, FACTS CANC
[2]  
Bennett CL, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V77, P1854
[3]   WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
SUTHERLAND, HJ ;
HEASMAN, KZ ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
CUMMINGS, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :58-67
[4]   Cancer patients, doctors and nurses vary in their willingness to undertake cancer chemotherapy [J].
Bremnes, RM ;
Andersen, K ;
Wist, EA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (12) :1955-1959
[5]  
BROCK DW, 1993, QUALITY LIFE
[6]  
CASSILETH B, 1980, ANN INTERN MED, V92, P823
[7]   PERCEPTIONS OF CANCER-PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS INVOLVED IN PHASE-I TRIALS [J].
DAUGHERTY, C ;
RATAIN, MJ ;
GROCHOWSKI, E ;
STOCKING, C ;
KODISH, E ;
MICK, R ;
SIEGLER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1062-1072
[8]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[9]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[10]  
GREENBURG ER, 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V86, P151