Patient preferences among third agent HIV medications: A US and German perspective

被引:21
作者
Beusterien, K. M.
Dziekan, K.
Schrader, S.
Flood, E.
Flood, R.
Shearer, A.
Davis, E. A.
机构
[1] Oxford Outcomes, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Southampton Med Grp, Houston, TX USA
[3] United BioSource Corp, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] GlaxoSmithKline, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
来源
AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV | 2007年 / 19卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09540120701294278
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective is to assess patient preferences for attributes associated with third agent HIV medications, including fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPVr), fosamprenavir (FPV), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPVr), atazanavir (ATZ), and efavirenz (EFV). Subjects with HIV were recruited in the US and Germany to complete a computerized adaptive conjoint survey that assessed 13 attributes, including moderate to severe side effects, regimen convenience, drug resistance and efficacy. Literature on the target third-agent HIV drugs was used to identify percentage risk and severity level descriptions for each attribute. The derived preference (utility) weights for each attribute level informed the calculation of relative importance estimates for each attribute and the desirability of combinations of attributes matching the respective target third agents. The analysis included 288 HIV-positive participants (US: 132; Germany: 156), 205 of whom were treatment-experienced and 83 of whom were treatment-naive. Of the 13 medication attributes evaluated, developing drug resistance, the risk of lipodystrophy, the risk of gastronitestinal side effects (diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting) and regimen convenience had the greatest impact on preferences. The profile based on FPVr was most preferred. Differences in the risk of developing drug resistance, risk of lipodystrophy, risk of gastrointestinal side effects and regimen convenience would likely be most influential in the perceived relative value of a third-agent medication. Physicians may wish to consider these features, especially when discussing HIV treatment options with their patients.
引用
收藏
页码:982 / 988
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Correlates and predictors of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: Overview of published literature [J].
Ammassari, A ;
Trotta, MP ;
Murri, R ;
Castelli, F ;
Narciso, P ;
Noto, P ;
Vecchiet, J ;
D'Arminio Monforte, A ;
Wu, AW ;
Antinori, A .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2002, 31 :S123-S127
[2]   Patient preference and willingness-to-pay for humalog mix25 relative to humulin 30/70: A multicountry application of a discrete choice experiment [J].
Aristides, M ;
Weston, AR ;
FitzGerald, P ;
Le Reun, C ;
Maniadakis, N .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (04) :442-454
[3]   Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: Feasibility assessment [J].
Beusterien, KM ;
Dziekan, K ;
Flood, E ;
Harding, G ;
Jordan, JC .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (04) :453-461
[4]   The relationship between lipodystrophy-associated body changes and measures of quality of life and mental health for HIV-positive adults [J].
Burgoyne, R ;
Collins, E ;
Wagner, C ;
Abbey, S ;
Halman, M ;
Nur, M ;
Walmsley, S .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (04) :981-990
[5]   Predictors of adherence and virologic outcome in HIV-infected patients treated with abacavir- or indinavir-based triple combination HAART also containing lamivudine/zidovudine [J].
Cahn, P ;
Vibhagool, A ;
Schechter, M ;
Soto-Ramirez, L ;
Carosi, G ;
Smaill, F ;
Jordan, JC ;
Pharo, CE ;
Thomas, NE ;
Steele, HM .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2004, 20 (07) :1115-1123
[6]   Adherence to HAART regimens [J].
Chesney, M .
AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2003, 17 (04) :169-177
[7]  
Echavez Michael, 2005, AIDS Read, V15, P369
[8]   Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Fraenkel, L ;
Bogardus, ST ;
Concato, J ;
Felson, DT ;
Wittink, DR .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 (11) :1372-1378
[9]   Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with Adaptive Conjoint Analysis [J].
Fraenkel, L ;
Bogardus, S ;
Wittink, DR .
MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (11) :1203-1216
[10]   SOLO:: 48-week efficacy and safety comparison of once-daily fosamprenavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily nelfinavir in naive HIV-1-infected patients [J].
Gathe, JC ;
Ive, P ;
Wood, R ;
Schürmann, D ;
Bellos, NC ;
DeJesus, E ;
Gladysz, A ;
Garris, C ;
Yeo, J .
AIDS, 2004, 18 (11) :1529-1537