Dialysis patient ratings of the quality of medical care

被引:15
作者
Alexander, GC
Sehgal, AR
机构
[1] Metrohlth Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
quality of care; nephrology; primary health care; hemodialysis;
D O I
10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9708614
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Dialysis patients receive medical care from a variety of physicians. Little is known about how dialysis patients assess the quality of this care. We sought to determine (1) who dialysis patients receive medical care from, (2) how they rate the quality of such care, and (3) how ratings differ for care provided by generalists, nephrologists, and other specialists. We performed a cross-sectional interview study of 148 patients from four chronic hemodialysis units. Using a structured questionnaire, we asked subjects about each condition for which they received care in the preceding 12 months. For each condition, subjects mentioned the type of physician who provided care and then rated their overall satisfaction with care as well as six components of quality of care (availability of doctor, technical skill, personal manner, explanations provided, amount of time spent, and how much patient was helped). We found that generalists, nephrologists, and other specialists provided care for 14%, 48%, and 38% of conditions for which patients received care. Sixty-nine percent of overall satisfaction ratings were very good or better. Of the six components of quality of care, explanations and amount of time received the lowest ratings. On multivariate analysis, increased patient age, black race, and care for acute illnesses were associated with lower ratings of quality of care. There was no difference in ratings of care provided by generalists, nephrologists, and other specialists. In conclusion, dialysis patients receive most of their medical care from nephrologists and other specialists. Although they generally rate this care highly, we recommend that providers pay special attention to explanations provided, time spent with patients, and care for acute illness. (C) 1998 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 289
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AHCPR, AHCPR PUBL
[2]   SATISFYING SOLUTIONS - A REVIEW OF SOME UNRESOLVED ISSUES IN THE MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT SATISFACTION [J].
AVIS, M ;
BOND, M ;
ARTHUR, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1995, 22 (02) :316-322
[3]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[4]  
CLEARY P, 1996, MEASURING MANAGING H
[5]   TRANSFERRING THE COSTS OF EXPENSIVE TREATMENTS FROM SECONDARY TO PRIMARY-CARE [J].
CRUMP, BJ ;
PANTON, R ;
DRUMMOND, MF ;
MARCHMENT, M ;
HAWKES, RA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6978) :509-512
[6]  
DAVIES AR, 1991, CONSUMER SATISFACTIO
[7]  
DAVIES AR, 1996, MEASURING MANAGING H
[8]  
Eschbach J, 1997, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V30, pS192
[9]   THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE [J].
EVANS, RW ;
MANNINEN, DL ;
GARRISON, LP ;
HART, LG ;
BLAGG, CR ;
GUTMAN, RA ;
HULL, AR ;
LOWRIE, EG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (09) :553-559
[10]  
Farley DO, 1996, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V17, P129