ESR1 and EGF genetic variation in relation to breast cancer risk and survival

被引:28
作者
Einarsdottir, Kristjana [2 ]
Darabi, Hatef [3 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Low, Yen Ling [1 ]
Li, Yu Qing [1 ]
Bonnard, Carine [1 ]
Sjolander, Arvid [3 ]
Czene, Kamila [3 ]
Wedren, Sara [3 ]
Liu, Edison T. [1 ]
Hall, Per [3 ]
Humphreys, Keith [3 ]
Liu, Jianjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm 17177, Sweden
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2008年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1186/bcr1861
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Oestrogen exposure is a central factor in the development of breast cancer. Oestrogen receptor alpha ( ESR1) is the main mediator of oestrogen effect in breast epithelia and has also been shown to be activated by epidermal growth factor ( EGF). We sought to determine if common genetic variation in the ESR1 and EGF genes affects breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics or breast cancer survival. Methods We genotyped 157 single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs) in ESR1 and 54 SNPs in EGF in 92 Swedish controls and selected haplotype tagging SNPs ( tagSNPs) that could predict both single SNP and haplotype variation in the genes with an R-2 of at least 0.8. The tagSNPs were genotyped in 1,590 breast cancer cases and 1,518 controls, and their association with breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics and survival were assessed using unconditional logistic regression models, Cox proportional hazard models and haplotype analysis. Results The single tagSNP analysis did not reveal association evidence for breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics, or survival. A multi- locus analysis of five adjacent tagSNPs suggested a region in ESR1 ( between rs3003925 and rs2144025) for association with breast cancer risk ( p = 0.001), but the result did not withstand adjustment for multiple comparisons ( p = 0.086). A similar region was also implicated by haplotype analyses, but its significance needs to be verified by follow- up analysis. Conclusion Our results do not support a strong association between common variants in the ESR1 and EGF genes and breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics or survival.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustment
[2]  
Boyapati SM, 2005, CLIN CANCER RES, V11, P1093
[3]  
Cai QY, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P853
[4]   Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: A class of tests and the determinants of statistical power [J].
Chapman, JM ;
Cooper, JD ;
Todd, JA ;
Clayton, DG .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 2003, 56 (1-3) :18-31
[5]   Use of unphased multilocus genotype data in indirect association studies [J].
Clayton, D ;
Chapman, J ;
Cooper, J .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (04) :415-428
[6]   Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) and estrogen receptor-beta (ER beta) messenger ribonucleic acid in the wild-type and ER alpha-knockout mouse [J].
Couse, JF ;
Lindzey, J ;
Grandien, K ;
Gustafsson, JA ;
Korach, KS .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1997, 138 (11) :4613-4621
[7]  
Curran JE, 2001, INT J CANCER, V95, P271, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(20010720)95:4<271::AID-IJC1046>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-D
[9]  
DICKSON RB, 1998, BREAST COMPREHENSIVE, V518, P536
[10]  
Dunning AM, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P843