The water vapour intercomparison effort in the framework of the Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study: airborne-to-ground-based and airborne-to-airborne lidar systems

被引:55
作者
Bhawar, R. [1 ]
Di Girolamo, P. [1 ]
Summa, D. [1 ]
Flamant, C. [2 ]
Althausen, D. [3 ]
Behrendt, A. [4 ]
Kiemle, C. [5 ]
Bosser, P. [6 ]
Cacciani, M. [7 ]
Champollion, C. [2 ]
Di Iorio, T. [7 ]
Engelmann, R. [3 ]
Herold, C. [3 ]
Mueller, D. [3 ]
Pal, S. [4 ]
Wirth, M. [5 ]
Wulfmeyer, V. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basilicata, DIFA, I-85100 Potenza, Italy
[2] CNRS UPMC, Atmospheres Lab, Paris, France
[3] Leibniz Inst Tropospher Res, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Phys & Meteorol, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
[5] DLR Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Wessling, Germany
[6] LOEMI Inst Geog Natl, St Mande, France
[7] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Fis, Rome, Italy
关键词
water vapour; DIAL; Raman lidar; bias; root-mean-square deviation; DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION LIDAR; INTERNATIONAL H2O PROJECT; ROTATIONAL RAMAN LIDAR; ATMOSPHERIC-TEMPERATURE; FUTURE PERFORMANCE; RELATIVE-HUMIDITY; LEANDRE-II; PART II; IHOP-2002; TROPOSPHERE;
D O I
10.1002/qj.697
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An intensive water vapour intercomparison effort, involving airborne and ground-based water vapour lidar systems, was carried out in the framework of the COPS experiment. The main objective of this paper is to provide accurate error estimates for these systems. Comparisons between the ground-based Raman lidar BASIL and the airborne CNRS DIAL (Differential Absorption Lidar) indicate a mean relative bias between the two sensors, calculated with respect to the mean value of -2.13% (-0.034 g kg(-1)) in the altitude region 0.5-3.5 km, while comparisons between BASIL and the airborne DLR DIAL lead to a mean relative bias of 1.87% (0.018 g kg(-1)) in this same altitude region. Comparisons between the ground-based UHOH DIAL and the CNRS DIAL indicate a bias of -3.2% (-0.37 x 10(22) m(-3)) in the altitude range 1.5-4.5 km, while comparisons between the UHOH DIAL and the DLR DIAL indicate a bias of 0.83% (0.06x10(22) m(-3)) in this same altitude range. Based on the available comparisons between the ground-based Raman lidar BERTHA and the CNRS DIAL, the mean relative bias is found to be -4.37% (-0.123 g kg(-1)) in the altitude region 0.5-4.5 km. Comparisons between the ground-based IGN Raman lidar and the CNRS DIAL indicate a bias of 3.18% (0.55 g kg(-1)) in the altitude range from 0.5 to 4.5 km, while comparisons between the CNRS DIAL and DLR DIAL result in a mean relative bias of 3.93% (1.1 x 10(22) m(-3)) in the altitude interval 0.5-4.0 km. Based on the available statistics of comparisons, benefiting from the fact that the CNRS DIAL was able to be compared with all other lidar systems, and putting equal weight on the data reliability of each instrument, overall relative values for BASIL, BERTHA, IGN Raman lidar, UHOH DIAL, DLR DIAL, and CNRS DIAL, with respect to the mean value, are found to be -0.38, -2.60, 4.90, -1.43, -2.23 and 1.72%, respectively. Copyright (C) 2011 Royal Meteorological Society
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 348
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Althausen D, 2000, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V17, P1469, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1469:SWCAL>2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] NASA/Aura/Microwave Limb Sounder water vapor validation at Mauna Loa Observatory by Raman lidar
    Barnes, John E.
    Kaplan, Trevor
    Voemel, Holger
    Read, William G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D15)
  • [4] Observation of convection initiation processes with a suite of state-of-the-art research instruments during COPS IOP 8b
    Behrendt, A.
    Pal, S.
    Aoshima, F.
    Bender, M.
    Blyth, A.
    Corsmeier, U.
    Cuesta, J.
    Dick, G.
    Dorninger, M.
    Flamant, C.
    Di Girolamo, P.
    Gorgas, T.
    Huang, Y.
    Kalthoff, N.
    Khodayar, S.
    Mannstein, H.
    Traeumner, K.
    Wieser, A.
    Wulfmeyer, V.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 137 : 81 - 100
  • [5] BEHRENDT A, 2009, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V7475, DOI DOI 10.1117/12.83514
  • [6] Intercomparison of water vapor data measured with lidar during IHOP_2002. Part I: Airborne to ground-based lidar systems and comparisons with chilled-mirror hygrometer radiosondes
    Behrendt, Andreas
    Wulfmeyer, Volker
    Di Girolamo, Paolo
    Kiemle, Christoph
    Bauer, Hans-Stefan
    Schaberl, Thorsten
    Summa, Donato
    Whiteman, David N.
    Demoz, Belay B.
    Browell, Edward V.
    Ismail, Syed
    Ferrare, Richard
    Kooi, Susan
    Ehret, Gerhard
    Wang, Junhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 24 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [7] Intercomparison of water vapor data measured with lidar during IHOP_2002. Part II: Airborne-to-airborne systems
    Behrendt, Andreas
    Wulfmeyer, Volker
    Kiemle, Christoph
    Ehret, Gerhard
    Flamant, Cyrille
    Schaberl, Thorsten
    Bauer, Hans-Stefan
    Kooi, Susan
    Ismail, Syed
    Ferrare, Richard
    Browell, Edward V.
    Whiteman, David N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 24 (01) : 22 - 39
  • [8] Initiation of convection over the Black Forest mountains during COPS IOP15a
    Bennett, Lindsay J.
    Blyth, Alan M.
    Burton, Ralph R.
    Gadian, Alan M.
    Weckwerth, Tammy M.
    Behrendt, Andreas
    Di Girolamo, Paolo
    Dorninger, Manfred
    Lock, Sarah-Jane
    Smith, Victoria H.
    Mobbs, Stephen D.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 137 : 176 - 189
  • [9] Spectrally resolved observations of atmospheric emitted radiance in the H2O rotation band
    Bhawar, R.
    Bianchini, G.
    Bozzo, A.
    Cacciani, M.
    Calvello, M. R.
    Carlotti, M.
    Castagnoli, F.
    Cuomo, V.
    Di Girolamo, P.
    Di Iorio, T.
    Di Liberto, L.
    Di Sarra, A.
    Esposito, F.
    Fiocco, G.
    Fua, D.
    Grieco, G.
    Maestri, T.
    Masiello, G.
    Muscari, G.
    Palchetti, L.
    Papandrea, E.
    Pavese, G.
    Restieri, R.
    Rizzi, R.
    Romano, F.
    Serio, C.
    Summa, D.
    Todini, G.
    Tosi, E.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (04)
  • [10] Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: methodology
    Bosenberg, J
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 1998, 37 (18): : 3845 - 3860