Cervicothoracic approach for total mesoesophageal dissection in cancer of the thoracic esophagus

被引:64
作者
Matsubara, T [1 ]
Ueda, M [1 ]
Nagao, N [1 ]
Takahashi, T [1 ]
Nakajima, T [1 ]
Nishi, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg, Toshima Ku, Tokyo 170, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00159-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The clinical significance of lymph node involvement along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in cancer of the thoracic esophagus is still controversial. Although these lymph nodes are anatomically located in a well-defined compartment (proximal mesoesophagus), appropriate procedures for dissecting them are not well established. Study Design: We retrospectively investigated clinical results over the past 10 years in 276 patients who underwent systematic dissection of cervical, mediastinal, and upper abdominal lymph nodes. We routinely performed the cervical procedure before thoracotomy for total dissection of the proximal mesoesophagus and to minimize the operative risk. Results: All macroscopically recognizable lesions were resected in 94% of the patients. The hospital mortality rate was 2.5%. Recurrent nerve palsy developed in 59 patients, but it was successfully managed without prolonged hoarseness in 50 of them. The recurrent nerve node group was most frequently involved (frequency of 25% in superficial cancer, 57% in non-superficial cancer). Supradiaphragmatic lymph node involvement was limited to the recurrent nerve nodes in 25% of the patients with positive supradiaphragmatic node. The 5-year survival rate in patients with positive recurrent nerve nodes was 34%. Conclusions: Dissection of the recurrent nerve lymph nodes is essential for curative esophagectomy even in the early phase of cancer invasion. Our cervicothoracic approach for total dissection of the proximal mesoesophagus yielded acceptable outcomes. (J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187:238-245. (C) 1998 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Occult cervical nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer: Preliminary results of three-field lymphadenectomy
    Altorki, NK
    Skinner, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (03) : 540 - 544
  • [2] LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SUBTOTAL ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH 3-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE THORACIC ESOPHAGUS
    BABA, M
    AIKOU, T
    YOSHINAKA, H
    NATSUGOE, S
    FUKUMOTO, T
    SHIMAZU, H
    AKAZAWA, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (03) : 310 - 316
  • [3] MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY RATES, POSTOPERATIVE COURSE, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, AND PROGNOSIS AFTER EXTENDED RADICAL LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - COMPARISON OF 3-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY WITH 2-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY
    FUJITA, H
    KAKEGAWA, T
    YAMANA, H
    SHIMA, I
    TOH, Y
    TOMITA, Y
    FUJII, T
    YAMASAKI, K
    HIGAKI, K
    NOAKE, T
    ISHIBASHI, N
    MIZUTANI, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (05) : 654 - 662
  • [4] The fasciae and fasctal spaces of the head, neck and adjacent regions
    Grodinsky, M
    Holyoke, EA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1938, 63 (03): : 367 - 408
  • [5] TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION IS OPTIMAL SURGERY FOR RECTAL-CANCER - A SCANDINAVIAN CONSENSUS
    HEALD, RJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (10) : 1297 - 1299
  • [6] EVALUATION OF NECK LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA
    KATO, H
    WATANABE, H
    TACHIMORI, Y
    IIZUKA, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1991, 51 (06) : 931 - 935
  • [7] KINOSHITA I, 1976, JPN J GASTROENTEROL, V9, P423
  • [8] Malassagne B, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V185, P244
  • [9] CAN ESOPHAGECTOMY CURE CANCER OF THE THORACIC ESOPHAGUS INVOLVING THE MAJOR AIRWAYS
    MATSUBARA, T
    UEDA, M
    NAKAJIMA, T
    NAKAGAWA, K
    YAMASHITA, T
    HORIKOSHI, N
    YANAGISAWA, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 59 (01) : 173 - 177
  • [10] PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LYMPH-NODES IN THE PREDICTION OF DISEASE SPREAD AND OUTCOME IN CANCER OF THE THORACIC ESOPHAGUS
    MATSUBARA, T
    UEDA, M
    NAKAJIMA, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (03) : 356 - 359