The dependence of the distortion product 2f1-f2 on primary levels in non-impaired human ears

被引:19
作者
Dhar, S
Long, GR
Culpepper, NB
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Audiol & Speech Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Gallaudet Univ, Washington, DC 20002 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 1998年 / 41卷 / 06期
关键词
otoacoustic emissions; DPOAEs; primary levels; power subtraction;
D O I
10.1044/jslhr.4106.1307
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The optimal intensity relation between the two primaries used to generate Distortion Product Otoacovstic Emissions (DPOAEs) in unimpaired human ears, over a clinically relevant intensity range, was evaluated using a commercially available clinical device. The ILO92 was used to determine the level of the DPOAE at 2f(1) - f(2) for 16 combinations of primary levels in the range of 40 to 80 dB SPL from 40 unimpaired, young adult ears. Data were collected between 1 and 6 kHz at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 kHz. The commonly used procedure of dropping data points less than 3 dB above the noise floor was compared to a power subtraction procedure. A multivariate ANOVA was performed to determine main effects of gender, ear, stimulus levels, frequencies, and interactions between stimulus levels and frequencies. An overall increase of DPOAE amplitude with increase in primary level was observed, along with a decrease of the optimal difference in primary levels as L-2 was increased. Although the power subtraction and 3-dB drop paradigms yielded similar results at high stimulus levels, the power subtraction paradigm provided a more realistic indicator of DPOAE level when low level primaries were used. Possible mechanisms responsible for the level dependence of the optimal relationship between primaries and implications for clinical choice of primary levels are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1318
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f(1)-f(2)) amplitude as a function of f(2)/f(1) frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates [J].
Abdala, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (06) :3726-3740
[2]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1996, SPEC AUD
[3]  
BOEGE P, 1998, 20 MIDW M ASS RES OT
[4]   SUPPRESSIBILITY OF THE 2F1-F2 STIMULATED ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN GERBIL AND MAN [J].
BROWN, AM ;
KEMP, DT .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 13 (01) :29-37
[5]   The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans [J].
Engdahl, B ;
Kemp, DT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 99 (03) :1573-1587
[6]   THE BEHAVIOR OF THE ACOUSTIC DISTORTION PRODUCT, 2F1-F2, FROM THE HUMAN EAR AND ITS RELATION TO AUDITORY-SENSITIVITY [J].
GASKILL, SA ;
BROWN, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 88 (02) :821-839
[7]  
HARRIS F P, 1992, Seminars in Hearing, V13, P67, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1085142
[8]   ACOUSTIC DISTORTION PRODUCTS IN HUMANS - SYSTEMATIC CHANGES IN AMPLITUDE AS A FUNCTION OF F2/F1 RATIO [J].
HARRIS, FP ;
LONSBURYMARTIN, BL ;
STAGNER, BB ;
COATS, AC ;
MARTIN, GK .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1989, 85 (01) :220-229
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF SYSTEMATIC PRIMARY-TONE LEVEL VARIATION L2-L1 ON THE ACOUSTIC DISTORTION PRODUCT EMISSION 2F1-F2 IN NORMAL HUMAN EARS [J].
HAUSER, R ;
PROBST, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1991, 89 (01) :280-286
[10]  
HELLE R, 1969, ACUSTICA, V22, P74