Development of an easy prognostic score for frailty outcomes in the aged

被引:122
作者
Ravaglia, Giovanni [1 ]
Forti, Paola [1 ]
Lucicesare, Anna [1 ]
Pisacane, Nicoletta [1 ]
Rietti, Elisa [1 ]
Patterson, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Internal Med Cardioangiol & Hepatol, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
关键词
frailty; ageing; mortality; fractures; disability; elderly;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afm195
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: identification of frailty is recommended in geriatric practice. However, there is a lack of frailty scores combining easy-to-collect predictors from multiple domains. Objective: to develop a frailty score including only self-reported information and easy-to-perform standardised measurements recommended in routine geriatric practice. Design: prospective population-based study. Setting/Participants: included 1,007 Italian subjects aged 65 and over. Measurements: seventeen baseline possible mortality predictors from several domains, 4-year risk of mortality and other adverse health outcomes associated with frailty [fractures, hospitalisation, and new and worsening activities of daily living (ADL) disability]. Methods: a multivariate Cox model was used to identify the best sub-group of independent predictors and to develop a mortality prognostic score, defined as the number of adverse predictors present. Logistic regression was used to verify whether the score also predicted risk of other frailty outcomes in the cohort survivors. Results: nine independent mortality predictors were identified. Among subjects with score 3, each one point increase in the score was associated with a doubling in mortality risk and, among survivors, with an increased risk of all the other adverse health outcomes. Conclusions: nine easy-to-collect predictors may identify aged people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes associated with frailty.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 166
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012369391-4/50051-5
[2]   Just what defines frailty? [J].
Fisher, AL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (12) :2229-2230
[3]   Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype [J].
Fried, LP ;
Tangen, CM ;
Walston, J ;
Newman, AB ;
Hirsch, C ;
Gottdiener, J ;
Seeman, T ;
Tracy, R ;
Kop, WJ ;
Burke, G ;
McBurnie, MA .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 56 (03) :M146-M156
[4]   THE FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (SMAF) - DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF HANDICAPS [J].
HEBERT, R ;
CARRIER, R ;
BILODEAU, A .
AGE AND AGEING, 1988, 17 (05) :293-302
[5]  
Inelmen E M, 2003, Obes Rev, V4, P147, DOI 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00107.x
[6]   Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment [J].
Jones, DM ;
Song, XW ;
Rockwood, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (11) :1929-1933
[7]   PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT OF INDEX OF ADL [J].
KATZ, S ;
DOWNS, TD ;
CASH, HR ;
GROTZ, RC .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1970, 10 (01) :20-&
[8]  
Kovar MG, 1994, Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, V14, P57
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF OLDER PEOPLE - SELF-MAINTAINING AND INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING [J].
LAWTON, MP ;
BRODY, EM .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1969, 9 (3P1) :179-&
[10]   Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults [J].
Lee, SJ ;
Lindquist, K ;
Segal, MR ;
Covinsky, KE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (07) :801-808