The Conceptualization and Measurement of Individualized Care

被引:23
作者
Charalambous, Andreas [1 ]
Chappell, Neena L. [2 ,3 ]
Katajisto, Jouko [4 ]
Suhonen, Riitta [5 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Nursing Studies, Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] Univ Victoria, Ctr Aging, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[3] Univ Victoria, Dept Sociol, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Stat, Turku, Finland
[5] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
关键词
NURSING-CARE; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; NURSES; PATIENT; SCALE; TRANSLATION; EMPOWERMENT; PERCEPTIONS; RELIABILITY; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Individualized nursing care, a form of person-centered care delivery, is accepted as best practice, yet its implementation into actual care is far from complete. Appropriate measures of this elusive concept are needed to better understand barriers to implementation. This study explored and tested the convergent validity and the reliability of 2 individualized nursing care measures. A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data using the Individualized Care Scale and the Individualized Care Instrument (ICI) from a sample of nurses (n = 263, response rate 71%) working in older peoples' care settings in Finland, and the data were analyzed statistically. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the ICI scales (.63-.80) and ICS-A and B subscales (both alpha = .91) demonstrated only moderate correlation between the 2 instruments (r = -.39 to.50) and possibly the complexity of measuring "individualized care." The study acknowledges the latent influence of culture and care approach to the conceptualization of individuality. It concludes that the concept may best be measured at this point with the use of other factors in addition to instruments to capture its multiple domains. (Geriatr Nurs 2012;33:17-27)
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
  • [3] [Anonymous], CULTURAL CARE DIVERS
  • [4] Burns N., 2005, The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and utilization, V5th
  • [5] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX
    CAMPBELL, DT
    FISKE, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) : 81 - 105
  • [6] The influence of care provider access to structural empowerment on individualized care in long-term-care facilities
    Caspar, Sienna
    O'Rourke, Norm
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2008, 63 (04): : S255 - S265
  • [7] The Differential Influence of Culture Change Models on Long-Term Care Staff Empowerment and Provision of Individualized Care
    Caspar, Sienna
    O'Rourke, Norm
    Gutman, Gloria M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2009, 28 (02): : 165 - 175
  • [8] Chappell N.L., 2010, Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, V5, P5
  • [9] Chappell N.L., 2007, Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, V6, P527, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1471301207084372, https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207084372]
  • [10] Nursing older dying patients: findings from an ethnographic study of death and dying in elderly care wards
    Costello, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (01) : 59 - 68