Phase III study of bolus versus infusion fluorouracil with or without cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer

被引:111
作者
Hansen, RM
Ryan, L
Anderson, T
Krzywda, B
Quebbeman, E
Benson, A
Haller, DG
Tormey, DC
机构
[1] DANA FARBER CANC INST,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] MED COLL WISCONSIN,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[3] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,CHICAGO,IL
[4] UNIV PENN,CTR CANC,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104
[5] AMC CANC RES CTR,DENVER,CO
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/88.10.668
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Phase II studies of fluorouracil (5-FU) administered by protracted intravenous infusion have suggested an improved response rate and decreased toxicity profile when compared with 5-FU given by bolus injection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, Additional studies have suggested further enhancement of infusion 5-FU activity when it is combined with low-dose weekly cisplatin administration, Purpose: This phase III study in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer was planned as a comparison of objective response rates, toxicity, and survival in patients receiving bolus versus protracted-infusion 5-FU with or without cisplatin, Methods: Four hundred ninety-seven previously untreated patients with advanced, measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive treatment A (bolus 5-FU at 500 mg/m(2) for 5 days followed in 2 weeks by weekly bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m(2)), treatment B (bolus 5-FU at 500 mg/m(2) for 5 days followed in 2 weeks by weekly bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m(2), plus weekly cisplatin at 20 mg/m(2)), treatment C (5-FU at 300 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion), or treatment D (5-FU at 300 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion plus weekly cisplatin at 20 mg/m(2)), All drugs were administered intravenously, Enrollment in the trial occurred from August 1987 through December 1990, and follow-up was through September 1995, The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall and disease-free survival, and Cox regression models were used to assess the effects of patient characteristics on survival, All P values resulted from two-sided tests, Results: Objective tumor response was observed in 28 (18%) of 153 patients receiving treatment A, in 45 (28%) of 159 patients receiving treatment C (C versus A; P = .045), and in 47 (31%) of 153 patients receiving treatment D (D versus A; P = .016), Because of excessive toxicity, treatment B was discontinued after only 12 patients had begun treatment, Median time to disease progression was 5.1 months for patients in arm A compared with 6.2 and 6.5 months for patients in arms C and D, respectively (C versus A, P = .007; D versus A, P = .017), Patterns of toxic effects differed substantially among the treatment arms, Forty-five percent of the patients receiving bolus 5-FU alone (A) experienced grade 3-4 leukopenia, with two sepsis-related deaths, Hand-foot syndrome and mucositis were the major treatment-limiting toxic effects for patients in the two treatment arms involving infusion, Despite the improvement in response rates and time to disease progression with infusion 5-FU with or without cisplatin (C and D, respectively) (P = .003), the overall survival for the three groups (A, C, and D) was similar (P = .307), This mag have been due in part to a longer median survival time of 10.4 months for patients in arm A, compared with an anticipated survival of 7 months, Conclusion: 5-FU given as a continuous infusion produced a higher objective response rate, a modest prolongation in time to disease progression, and less life-threatening myelosuppression in patients than bolus 5-FU, Concomitant treatment with low-dose cisplatin caused added toxicity and complexity of treatment and did not provide a major clinical benefit, No statistically significant survival differences were observed among the three treatment groups.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 674
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, Analysis of binary data
  • [2] BELT RJ, 1985, P ASCO, V4, P90
  • [3] BENEDETTO P, 1986, Proceedings American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, V5, P92
  • [4] CABALLERO GA, 1985, CANCER TREAT REP, V69, P13
  • [5] CANTRELL JE, 1987, CANCER TREAT REP, V71, P615
  • [6] Cox D. R., 1984, ANAL SURVIVAL DATA
  • [7] DIAZRUBIO E, 1988, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V7, P110
  • [8] FAINTUCH J S, 1986, Proceedings American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, V5, P93
  • [9] CONTINUOUS SYSTEMIC 5-FLUOROURACIL INFUSION IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER - RESULTS IN 91 PATIENTS
    HANSEN, R
    QUEBBEMAN, E
    AUSMAN, R
    FRICK, J
    RITCH, P
    SCHULTE, W
    HAAS, C
    BEATTY, P
    ANDERSON, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 40 (03) : 177 - 181
  • [10] RANDOMIZED STUDY OF CONTINUOUS INFUSION FLUOROURACIL VERSUS FLUOROURACIL PLUS CISPLATIN IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER
    KEMENY, N
    ISRAEL, K
    NIEDZWIECKI, D
    CHAPMAN, D
    BOTET, J
    MINSKY, B
    VINCIGUERRA, V
    ROSENBLUTH, R
    BOSSELLI, B
    COCHRAN, C
    SHEEHAN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (02) : 313 - 318