The incident patient cohort study design with uncontrolled dose - Substantial over-estimation of mortality as a function of peritoneal dialysis dose?

被引:3
作者
Gotch, FA
Gentile, DE
Keen, ML
Amerling, R
Folkert, VW
Kliger, AS
Shapiro, WB
机构
[1] DAVIES MED CTR,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94114
[2] ST JOSEPH HOSP,RENAL CTR,ORANGE,CA
[3] FRESENIUS USA,CLIN RES,WALNUT CREEK,CA
[4] BETH ISRAEL MED CTR,DIV NEPHROL & HYPERTENS,NEW YORK,NY 10003
[5] YESHIVA UNIV ALBERT EINSTEIN COLL MED,BAUMRITTER KIDNEY CTR,DIV NEPHROL,NEW YORK,NY
[6] YALE UNIV,NEW HAVEN CAPD INC,NEW HAVEN,CT
[7] BROOKDALE HOSP,DIV NEPHROL & HYPERTENS,BROOKLYN,NY
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00002480-199609000-00039
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In the Canada-USA (CANUSA) Study, the dialysis dose was neither randomized nor held constant, was measured at 6 month intervals, and the relative risk of mortality (R) was found to correlate linearly to mean values of weekly peritoneal plus renal urea clearance normalized to volume, (KprT/V)m, ranging from 1.5 to 2.3. A risk/dose (R/D) function was derived for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis from kinetic criteria for dose equivalency in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the HD R/D function. This PD R/D function was nonlinear with breakpoint from steep to shallow slope at (KprT/V)ud = 2.00, where ud refers to uniform single doses in contrast to mean doses with wide variances on the mean. The predicted decrease in renal urea clearance KrT/V per 6 months of CANUSA follow-up was computed from serial measured KrT/V in the Randomized Dialysis Prescription and Clinical Outcomes Study and showed it to be 0.21 +/- 0.34. The CANUSA (KprT/V)m values were corrected for the distributed values of 3 month decrements in KrT/V, and the population mortality risk at each (KprT/V)m dose level reported in CANUSA was computed from summation of the product of the R/D curve and fractional distribution of (KprT/V)ud values. From these calculations, the authors conclude that maximum (KprT/V)ud level achieved in CANUSA was 2.00, and the study does not define R/D response above this level.
引用
收藏
页码:M514 / M517
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Churchill DN, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P198
[2]   UREA INDEX AND OTHER PREDICTORS OF HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT SURVIVAL [J].
COLLINS, AJ ;
MA, JZ ;
UMEN, A ;
KESHAVIAH, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1994, 23 (02) :272-282
[3]  
DAUGIRDAS JT, 1993, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V4, P1205
[4]  
DAUGIRDAS JT, 1995, ASAIO J, V41, pM719, DOI 10.1097/00002480-199507000-00107
[5]  
GOTCH F, 1995, CLIN DIALYSIS
[6]   A MECHANISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DIALYSIS STUDY (NCDS) [J].
GOTCH, FA ;
SARGENT, JA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 28 (03) :526-534
[7]   EFFECTS OF DOSE OF DIALYSIS ON MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY [J].
HAKIM, RM ;
BREYER, J ;
ISMAIL, N ;
SCHULMAN, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1994, 23 (05) :661-669
[9]  
LEVIN NW, 1995, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V6, P606
[10]  
OWEN W, NEW ENGL J MED, V329, P1001