Entrepreneurship and uncertainty: Innovation and competition among the many

被引:35
作者
Brouwer, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Econ & Econometrics, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1008147829791
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Schumpeter stressed innovation and Knight uncertainty as preconditions for entrepreneurship and productivity growth. Schumpeter emphasized entry in his early work but came to consider incumbent innovation the dominant mode in his later work. Modern growth theory emphasizes dissemination of knowledge to explain progress in the steady state. The paper analyzes the effects of entry, market structures and uncertainty on the incidence and diffusion of innovation. The insertion of Knightian uncertainty in Schumpeter's model can explain why innovators are numerous and arrive unexpectedly. Uncertainty spurs diffusion and improves the utilization of human capital. Combining the ideas of Schumpeter and Knight also elucidates several stylized facts of entrepreneurship, such as small entry size; low chances of survival and high growth rates.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 160
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   INNOVATION, MARKET-STRUCTURE, AND FIRM SIZE [J].
ACS, ZJ ;
AUDRETSCH, DB .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (04) :567-574
[2]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[3]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, DOI DOI 10.2307/2534576
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1974, CAPITALISM SOCIALISM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, BUSINESS CYCLES THEO
[6]  
Arrow KJ, 1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, P609, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024
[7]  
Audretsch DB., 1995, INNOVATION IND EVOLU
[8]  
Baldwin JR., 1995, DYNAMICS IND COMPETI
[9]   WHEN ARE NASH EQUILIBRIA INDEPENDENT OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF AGENTS CHARACTERISTICS [J].
BERGSTROM, TC ;
VARIAN, HR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 52 (04) :715-718
[10]   Two worlds of venture capital: What happened to US and Dutch early stage investment? [J].
Brouwer, M ;
Hendrix, B .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1998, 10 (04) :333-348