Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems

被引:213
作者
Barsalou, LW [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
abstraction; concept; interpretation; dynamic; simulation; embodiment;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
After reviewing six senses of abstraction, this article focuses on abstractions that take the form of summary representations. Three central properties of these abstractions are established: (i) type-token interpretation; (ii) structured representation; and (iii) dynamic realization. Traditional theories of representation handle interpretation and structure well but are not sufficiently dynamical. Conversely, connectionist theories are exquisitely dynamic but have problems with structure. Perceptual symbol systems offer an approach that implements all three properties naturally. Within this framework, a loose collection of property and relation simulators develops to represent abstractions. Type-token interpretation results from binding a property simulator to a region of a perceived or simulated category member. Structured representation results from binding a configuration of property and relation simulators to multiple regions in an integrated manner. Dynamic realization results from applying different subsets of property and relation simulators to category members on different occasions. From this standpoint, there are no permanent or complete abstractions of a category in memory. Instead, abstraction is the skill to construct temporary online interpretations of a category's members. Although an infinite number of abstractions are possible, attractors develop for habitual approaches to interpretation. This approach provides new ways of thinking about abstraction phenomena in categorization, inference, background knowledge and learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1187
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 1976, LANGUAGE MEMORY THOU
[2]   SKILL ACQUISITION - COMPILATION OF WEAK-METHOD PROBLEM SOLUTIONS [J].
ANDERSON, JR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :192-210
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1972, UNDERSTANDING NATURA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PHILOS CONNECTIONIST
[5]  
Barsalou L.W., 1987, Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, P101, DOI DOI 10.3758/BF03196968
[6]  
Barsalou Lawrence W., 1993, P29
[7]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[9]   INTRACONCEPT SIMILARITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERCONCEPT SIMILARITY [J].
BARSALOU, LW .
SIMILARITY AND ANALOGICAL REASONING, 1989, :76-121
[10]  
BARSALOU LW, 1992, FRAMES, FIELDS, AND CONTRASTS, P21