Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia - A comparison to isoflurane and propofol anesthesia

被引:69
作者
Ebert, TJ
Robinson, BJ
Uhrich, TD
Mackenthun, A
Pichotta, PJ
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Milwaukee, WI 53295 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[3] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
关键词
discharge; emergence; orientation; wake-up;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199812000-00032
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane, which may cause a more rapid recovery from anesthesia; it also might cause faster emergence times than for propofol-based anesthesia. We evaluated a database that included recovery endpoints from controlled, randomized, prospective studies sponsored by Abbott Laboratories that compared sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol when extubation was planned immediately after completion of elective surgery in adult patients. Methods: Sevoflurane was compared to isoflurane in eight studies (N = 2,008) and to propofol in three studies (N = 436), Analysis of variance was applied using least squares method mean values to calculate the pooled mean difference in recovery endpoints between primary anesthetics. The effects of patient age and case duration also were determined, Results: Sevoflurane resulted in statistically significant shorter times to emergence (-3.3 min), response to command (-3.1 min), orientation (-4.0 min) and first analgesic (-8.9 min) but not time to eligibility for discharge (-1.7 min) compared to isoflurane (mean difference). Times to recovery end points increased with increasing case duration with isoflurane but not with sevoflurane (patients receiving isoflurane took 4-5 min more to emerge and respond to commands and 8.6 min more to achieve orientation during cases longer than 3 hr in duration than those receiving sevoflurane), Patients older than 65 yr had longer times to orientation, but within any age group, orientation was always faster after sevoflurane, There were no differences in recovery times between sevoflurane and propofol Conclusions: Recovery from sevoflurane was 3-4 min faster than with isoflurane in all age groups, and the difference was magnified in longer-duration surgical cases (> 3 hr).
引用
收藏
页码:1524 / 1531
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A phase III, multicenter, open label, randomized, comparative study evaluating the effect of sevoflurane versus isoflurane on the maintenance of anesthesia in adult ASA class I, II, and III inpatients [J].
Campbell, C ;
Andreen, M ;
Battito, MF ;
Camporesi, EM ;
Goldberg, ME ;
Grounds, RM ;
Hobbhahn, J ;
Lumb, P ;
Murray, JM ;
Solanki, DR ;
Heard, SO ;
Coriat, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 8 (07) :557-563
[2]  
Cantillo J, 1997, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V17, P779
[3]   Meta-analysis: A method for synthesizing research [J].
DAgostino, RB ;
Weintraub, M .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 58 (06) :605-616
[4]  
DEXTER F, 1995, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V83, P77
[5]  
EGER EI, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P977
[6]   RECOVERY FROM SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE ANESTHESIA AFTER OUTPATIENT GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY [J].
ERIKSSON, H ;
HAASIO, J ;
KORTTILA, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (03) :377-380
[7]   SEVOFLURANE FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON WITH PROPOFOL [J].
FREDMAN, B ;
NATHANSON, MH ;
SMITH, I ;
WANG, J ;
KLEIN, K ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :823-828
[8]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE IN HEALTHY PATIENTS [J].
FRINK, EJ ;
MALAN, TP ;
ATLAS, M ;
DOMINGUEZ, LM ;
DINARDO, JA ;
BROWN, BR .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (02) :241-245
[9]   The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients [J].
Jellish, WS ;
Lien, CA ;
Fontenot, HJ ;
Hall, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :479-485
[10]  
KATOH T, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P348