Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys

被引:136
作者
Blamey, RK [1 ]
Bennett, JW [1 ]
Morrison, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, ADFA, Sch Econ & Management, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3146997
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A number of recent papers have provided estimates of willingness to pay derived in contingent valuation surveys exceeding those revealed in experimental or real-life markets. One possible explanation for the overestimation of values is the presence of yea-saying. With the objective of reducing the occurrence of yea-saying, a new elicitation format, referred to as the dissonance-minimizing (DM)format, is proposed. An empirical comparison of the DM format with the conventional dichotomous-choice (DC) format and the ambivalence-reducing polychotomous choice (PC) format suggested by Ready, Whitehead, and Blomquist (1995) is made. Results are encouraging for the DM. (JEL Q26).
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 141
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ABELSON RP, 1989, ATTITUDE STRUCTURE F
[2]  
ACKERLOF GA, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P305
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, PENGUIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, PRICING EUROPEAN ENV
[5]  
[Anonymous], J ENVIRON ECON MANAG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 3 RES ASS COMM
[7]   RESPONSE BIAS, YEA-SAYING, AND DOUBLE NEGATIVE [J].
ARNDT, J ;
CRANE, E .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (02) :218-220
[8]   YEA-SAYING, NAY-SAYING, AND GOING TO EXTREMES - BLACK-WHITE DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE STYLES [J].
BACHMAN, JG ;
OMALLEY, PM .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1984, 48 (02) :491-509
[9]   ELICITATION AND TRUNCATION EFFECTS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BATEMAN, IJ ;
LANGFORD, IH ;
TURNER, RK ;
WILLIS, KG ;
GARROD, GD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 12 (02) :161-179
[10]  
Blamey R.K., 1996, FORESTRY EC ENV