Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review

被引:761
作者
Mulligan, CN
Yong, RN
Gibbs, BF
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Sch Engn, Goeenvironm Engn Res Ctr, Cardiff CF2 1XH, S Glam, Wales
[3] MDS Pharma Serv, Montreal, PQ H4R 2N6, Canada
关键词
soil flushing; soil remediation; surfactant; metals; field studies;
D O I
10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00117-4
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Extracting aqueous solutions with or without additives are employed to solubilize contaminants in soil. Since water solubility is the controlling removing mechanism, additives are used to enhance efficiencies. These additives can reduce the time to treat a site compared to the use of water alone. Additives must be of low toxicity and biodegradable. The research in this area has focussed mainly on halogenated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) acid is still quite limited for metal removal. Additives include surfactants, organic and inorganic acids, sodium hydroxide, which can dissolve organic soil matter, water-soluble solvents such as methanol, displacement of cations with nontoxic ones, complexing agents such as EDTA, acids in combination with complexing agents or oxidizing/reducing agents. Cationic, anionic and nonionic surfactants are particularly used for soil washing or Rushing. They contain both hydrophobic and hydrophilic portions, making them ideal for solubilization of hydrophobic compounds. Numerous studies have indicated that surfactants enhance recoveries of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs). There have also been indications that pretreatment of soil with surfactant washing to solubilize hydrophobic compounds such as PAHs enhances biodegradation of these contaminants. A few in situ field studies have been performed with surfactants. Large-scale treatment has been done mostly for organic removal. Soil pH, soil type, cation exchange capacity (CEC), particle size, permeabilities and contaminants all affect removal efficiencies. High clay and organic matter contents are particularly detrimental. Understanding the chemistry of the binding of the contaminant and the hydrogeology of the site are very important. Once the water is pumped from the soil, it must be extracted and then treated to remove the hydrocarbons and metals. Several technologies exist such as sodium hydroxide or sodium sulfide precipitation, ion exchange, activated carbon adsorption, ultrafiltration. reverse osmosis, electrodialysis and biological processes. Recycling of the surfactants is desired to decrease treatment costs. This paper will provide an overview of the laboratory research, field demonstration and full-scale application of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soil. The majority of pilot scale in situ flushing tests, particularly in the United States, have involved the use of surfactants and co-solvents. There are only a few full-scale projects however. Recent laboratory scale efforts by the authors concerning the use of biosurfactants, biologically produced surfactants, to enhance the removal of copper, cadmium and zinc from contaminated soils and sediments are discussed. Three types of biosurfactants were evaluated for their effectiveness. They included a lipopeptide called surfactin from Bacillus subtilis, a rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a sophorolipid from Torulopsis bombicola. The results indicated the feasibility of removing the metals with the anionic biosurfactants even though the exchangeable fractions were not significant. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 380
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
*AAEE, 1993, SOIL WASH SOIL FLUSH, V3
[2]  
*AATDF, 1998, SURF COS NAPL REM TE
[3]   INSITU SURFACTANT WASHING OF POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS AND OILS FROM A CONTAMINATED SITE [J].
ABDUL, AS ;
GIBSON, TL ;
ANG, CC ;
SMITH, JC ;
SOBCZYNSKI, RE .
GROUND WATER, 1992, 30 (02) :219-231
[4]  
ABRIOLA LM, 1993, 19 ANN RISK RED ENG, P173
[5]   AQUEOUS SURFACTANT WASHING OF RESIDUAL OIL CONTAMINATION FROM SANDY SOIL [J].
ANG, CC ;
ABDUL, AS .
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1991, 11 (02) :121-127
[6]  
[Anonymous], TE9602 GROUND WAT RE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1978, SURFACTANTS INTERFAC
[8]   Characterization of biosurfactants and their use in pollution removal state of the art (Review) [J].
Banat, IM .
ACTA BIOTECHNOLOGICA, 1995, 15 (03) :251-267
[9]  
Biermann M., 1987, SURFACTANTS CONSUMER, P23
[10]  
Brown CL, 1999, ACS SYM SER, V725, P64