Quality assurance for screening mammography data collection systems in 22 countries

被引:10
作者
Klabunde, CN
Sancho-Garnier, H
Broeders, M
Thoresen, S
Rodrigues, VJL
Ballard-Barbash, R
机构
[1] NCI, DCCPS, ARP, Hlth Serv & Econ Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Epidaure CRLC, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Canc Registry Norway, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
[5] Portuguese League Canc, P-3000 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
mass screening; mammography; breast cancer; quality assurance; data collection;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462301107087
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To document the mammography data that are gathered by the organized screening programs participating in the International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN), the nature of their procedures for data quality assurance, and the measures used to assess program performance and impact. Methods: A detailed questionnaire covering multiple aspects of quality assurance in screening mammography was mailed to IBSN representatives in 23 countries. Results: Countries collect a wealth of screening mammography data, much of it computerized. Most countries have designated staff for data quality assurance. All provide staff training, and most have documentation requirements for data collection. Nearly all have one or more procedures to maintain data confidentiality. Countries are heterogeneous in collecting and assessing data to monitor screening program performance and impact. Conclusions: Demonstrating that population-based screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality requires collection of high-quality data on key aspects of the multi-step screening process. Assuring the quality of data collection systems for screening mammography programs is an important and evolving area for IBSN countries.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 541
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Periodic screening for breast cancer: The health insurance plan project and its sequel, 1963-1986
[2]   Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment [J].
Ballard-Barbash, R ;
Klabunde, C ;
Paci, E ;
Broeders, M ;
Coleman, EA ;
Frachebond, J ;
Bouchard, F ;
Rennert, G ;
Shapiro, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1999, 8 (05) :417-426
[3]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[4]  
BASSETT LW, 1994, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[5]  
Bell C M, 1995, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V7, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)80503-5
[6]   Cervical cancer screening in Denmark [J].
Bigaard, J ;
Hariri, J ;
Lynge, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (17) :2198-2204
[7]   MAMMOGRAPHY REGISTRY - CONSIDERATIONS AND OPTIONS [J].
CLARK, RA ;
KING, PS ;
WORDEN, JK .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :91-93
[8]   BREAST-CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS - THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM [J].
DAY, NE ;
WILLIAMS, DRR ;
KHAW, KT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (06) :954-958
[9]  
de Wolf CJ, 1996, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[10]   SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
EDDY, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (05) :389-399