Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment

被引:150
作者
Rockwood, K
Howlett, S
Stadnyk, K
Carver, D
Powell, C
Stolee, P
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Div Geriatr Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] SW Ontario Reg Geriatr Program, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
goal attainment scaling; responsiveness; elderly; randomized controlled trial; comprehensive geriatric assessment; specialized geriatric intervention;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00132-X
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: Frail elderly patients have complex problems that require a multidimensional assessment and a range of treatment goals. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) measures multiple, individualized goals, but its responsiveness in comparative clinical trials has not been established. Methods: We assessed the responsiveness of GAS in a randomized, controlled trial of an interdisciplinary Mobile Geriatric Assessment Team (MGAT) in 265 rural frail older adults. Sensitivity to change was compared with standard measures; clinical meaningfulness was assessed in relation to a patient and a blinded physician global measure. Results: At 3 months follow-up, GAS was the most responsive measure (standardized response mean 1.22, Norman's responsiveness statistic 0.58) compared with the Barthel Index (1.13, 0.46), Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (0.10, 0.16, 0.02), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (0.23, 0.00), and modified Spitzer Quality of Life Index (-0.04, 0.00). Conclusions: Only GAS detected clinically important change associated with the MGAT intervention in these frail elderly patients. Clinometric measures can offer a responsive means of evaluating complex interventions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 743
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders [J].
Beaton, DE ;
HoggJohnson, S ;
Bombardier, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :79-93
[2]  
Cardillo JE, 1994, GOAL ATTAINMENT SCAL, P15
[3]  
FEINSTEIN A.R., 1987, CLINIMETRICS
[4]   CLINICAL JUDGMENT REVISITED - THE DISTRACTION OF QUANTITATIVE MODELS [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (09) :799-805
[5]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[6]  
Gordon J, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V283, P1824
[7]  
GRANGER CV, 1979, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V60, P145
[8]  
HEDRICK S C, 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, V39, p48S
[9]   A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A GERIATRIC CONSULTATION TEAM IN AN ACUTE-CARE HOSPITAL [J].
HOGAN, DB ;
FOX, RA .
AGE AND AGEING, 1990, 19 (02) :107-113
[10]   Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations [J].
Husted, JA ;
Cook, RJ ;
Farewell, VT ;
Gladman, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (05) :459-468