Antecedents and consequences of relationship intention: Implications for transaction and relationship marketing

被引:84
作者
Kumar, V
Bohling, TR
Ladda, RN
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Marketing, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] IBM Corp, Amer Market Intelligence, Atlanta, GA 30327 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
relationship intention; transactional intention; relationship marketing; transaction marketing; loyalty; lifetime duration; profitability; brand equity; firm equity; channel equity;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.06.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The terms relationship marketing (RM) and loyalty have been extensively promoted in marketing literature. Advocates of RM and loyalty have argued that RM leads to loyalty and loyalty leads to profitability. However, currently available evidence questions these arguments. We propose a term relationship intention. Relationship intention is willingness of a customer to develop a relationship with a firm while buying a product or a service attributed to a firm, a brand, and a channel. We build a multi-item scale for measuring relationship intention. We propose a framework, wherein we argue that the relationship intention is influenced by the customers' perceived firm equity, perceived brand equity, and perceived channel equity. We propose the consequences of relationship intention as being low cost to serve, price premium, word-of-mouth promotion, and company advertisement. We also argue that relationship intention moderates the association between lifetime duration and profitability. Finally, we discuss the managerial implications of relationship intention in terms of transaction and RM. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 676
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Alexander N., 2000, EUR J MARKETING, V34, P938, DOI DOI 10.1108/03090560010331432
  • [2] Sales forecasts for existing consumer produces and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?
    Armstrong, JS
    Morwitz, VG
    Kumar, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2000, 16 (03) : 383 - 397
  • [3] Baker MJ, 1998, J INTERACT MARK, V12, P47, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199823)12:4<47::AID-DIR5>3.3.CO
  • [4] 2-2
  • [5] Berry LX., 1983, EMERGING PERSPECTIVE, DOI DOI 10.1177/009207038501300332
  • [6] Bruner G.C., 1992, MARKETING SCALES HDB
  • [7] Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences
    Burnham, TA
    Frels, JK
    Mahajan, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2003, 31 (02) : 109 - 126
  • [8] Investments in consumer relationships:: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration
    De Wulf, K
    Odekerken-Schröder, G
    Iacobucci, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (04) : 33 - 50
  • [9] Dowling GR, 1997, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P71
  • [10] FISHBEIN M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE, P368