MEASURING VOTER TURNOUT BY USING THE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE EVIDENCE CALLING INTO QUESTION THE METHOD'S VALIDITY

被引:69
作者
Holbrook, Allyson L. [1 ]
Krosnick, Jon A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Survey Res Lab, Publ Adm & Psychol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MULTIPLE SENSITIVE ATTRIBUTES; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; INDUCED-ABORTION; DRUG-USE; DATA-COLLECTION; PREVALENCE; TELEPHONE; MODEL; BIAS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfq012
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Surveys usually yield reported rates of voting in elections that are higher than official turnout figures, a phenomenon often attributed to intentional misrepresentation by respondents who did not vote and would be embarrassed to admit that. The experiments reported here tested a procedure for reducing social desirability response bias by allowing respondents to report secretly whether they voted: the "randomized response technique." In a national telephone survey of a sample of American adults and eight national surveys of American adults conducted via the Internet, respondents were either unable or unwilling to implement the randomized response technique properly, raising questions about whether this technique has ever worked properly to achieve its goals.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 343
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
AARTS K, 2002, ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[2]  
Abelson R.P., 1992, Questions About Questions, P138
[3]  
AKERS RL, 1983, SOC FORCES, V62, P234
[4]  
Andolina M., 2003, GUIDE INDEX CIVIC PO
[5]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR J STAT
[6]   EVALUATION OF RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE IN A DRINKING SURVEY [J].
BARTH, JT ;
SANDLER, HM .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1976, 37 (05) :690-693
[7]   SENSITIVE DATA-COLLECTION THROUGH THE RANDOM RESPONSE TECHNIQUE - SOME IMPROVEMENTS [J].
BEGIN, G ;
BOIVIN, M ;
BELLEROSE, J .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 101 (01) :53-65
[8]   COMPARISON OF DATA GATHERED ON SENSITIVE QUESTIONS VIA DIRECT QUESTIONNAIRE, RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE TECHNIQUE, AND A PROJECTIVE METHOD [J].
BEGIN, G ;
BOIVIN, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1980, 47 (03) :743-750
[9]   THE TAKAHASI-SAKASEGAWA RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE TECHNIQUE - A FIELD-TEST [J].
BELDT, SF ;
DANIEL, WW ;
GARCHA, BS .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1982, 11 (01) :101-111
[10]   Overreporting voting - Why it happens and why it matters [J].
Bernstein, R ;
Chadha, A ;
Montjoy, R .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2001, 65 (01) :22-44