Structural identification: Analytical aspects

被引:74
作者
Aktan, E
Catbas, N
Turer, A
Zhang, ZF
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Drexel Intelligent Infrastruct Transp Safety Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Drexel Intelligent Infrastruct & Transp Safety In, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 1998年 / 124卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:7(817)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Analytical aspects of structural identification are discussed considering different types of models, different model calibration spaces, and different types and amounts of experimental information. Three-dimensional finite element models and 2D grid models of an operating highway bridge are developed. The models were calibrated by taking advantage of an extensive database of experimental information accumulated from the bridge. Different types of models of varying sizes permit comparison of automated optimized calibration and manual calibration approaches. The experimental data collected characterizes both the local and global behavior of the structure. Modal data acquired with high temporal and spatial resolutions, and instrumented monitoring data describing local and global responses from static and moving truck-load configurations were used to investigate the requisite quantity, quality, and attributes of experimental data that should be considered for analytical modeling and for choosing a model calibration strategy. It is shown that modal updating and calibration must be carried out in both modal and flexibility spaces, and further, that a certain amount of experimental local and global behavior information must be included to accomplish this task. In spite of the difficulties associated with analyzing and calibrating the large 3D finite element models, they performed better in representing the overall properties and responses of the structure. While the 2D grid models are more suitable for automated calibration, given their smaller size and faster computational attributes, their validity in representing the properties of the structure needs further exploration.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 829
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Aktan A.E., 1996, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, V2, P108, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(108), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(108), 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(1996)2:3(108)]
[2]   Structural identification for condition assessment: Experimental arts [J].
Aktan, AE ;
Farhey, DN ;
Helmicki, AJ ;
Brown, DL ;
Hunt, HJ ;
Lee, KL ;
Levi, A .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (12) :1674-1684
[3]  
AKTAN AE, 1993, 1393 NAT RES COUNC T, P175
[4]  
AKTAN AE, 1995, 1476 NAT RES COUNC T, P129
[5]  
Allemang R.J., 1982, P INT MODAL ANAL C, P110
[6]  
Cook R.D., 1989, CONCEPTS APPL FINITE, V3
[7]  
DEGER Y, 1995, P INT S NOND TEST CI, P345
[8]  
Ewins DJ., 1984, MODAL TESTING THEORY
[9]  
Farhey D. N., 1994, FHWAOH95021
[10]  
FISHER JW, 1996, P STRUCT MAT TECHN C