Proximal femoral anatomy of omomyiform primates

被引:27
作者
Dagosto, M [1 ]
Schmid, P [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ZURICH IRCHEL,ANTHROPOL INST & MUSEUM,CH-8057 ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Omomyiformes; Omomyidae; Microchoeridae; femur; Hemiacodon; Necrolemur; Microchoerus; Tarsius;
D O I
10.1006/jhev.1996.0003
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Compared to the adapid primates, the limb skeleton of omomyiforms is only poorly represented. With the discovery of some new material, the proximal femur is now known in several taxa, including representatives from both of the recognized families. We describe the femur of a very small North American omomyid from the Bridger formation (middle Eocene) and compare its anatomy with the omomyine Hemiacodon and the European microchoerids Nannopithex, Necrolemur and Microchoerus. Tarsius and omomyiforms share several features of the proximal femur which are correlated with frequent leaping in small primates, and which may be morphotypic for Tarsiiformes. Hemiacodon and the new small omomyid are quite similar to each other in that they both have a semicylindrical femoral head which, although more advanced than most primates, is not as derived as the fully cylindrical form exhibited by galagos and tarsiers. As with other areas of the postcranium, microchoerids are very distinct from North American omomyiforms. Microchoerus and Necrolemur exhibit features which are otherwise seen primarily in anthropoid primates such as a marked posterior projection of the lesser trochanter. In addition, Necrolemur shares a unique construction of the intertrochanteric crest with parapithecids. Despite these and other intriguing similarities of the postcranial skeleton, any relationship between microchoerids and early anthropoids is difficult to establish because of other marked differences between them. (C) 1996 Academic Press Limited
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 56
页数:28
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   THE VCL HYPOTHESIS REVISITED - PATTERNS OF FEMORAL MORPHOLOGY AMONG QUADRUPEDAL AND SALTATORIAL PROSIMIAN PRIMATES [J].
ANEMONE, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 1990, 83 (03) :373-393
[2]  
Anemone Robert L., 1993, P150
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANTHROPOID ORIGINS
[4]  
Beard K. Christopher, 1994, P55
[5]   1ST SKULLS OF THE EARLY EOCENE PRIMATE SHOSHONIUS-COOPERI AND THE ANTHROPOID-TARSIER DICHOTOMY [J].
BEARD, KC ;
KRISHTALKA, L ;
STUCKY, RK .
NATURE, 1991, 349 (6304) :64-67
[6]  
BOWN TM, 1987, J PALEONTOL, V61, P1
[7]  
Cartmill M, 1972, FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION, P97, DOI [10.4324/9781315132129-4, DOI 10.4324/9781315132129]
[8]  
Conroy G.C., 1976, Contributions Primatol, V8, P1
[9]  
Covert Herbert H., 1994, P29
[10]   DESCRIPTION OF NEW SKELETAL REMAINS OF THE EARLY EOCENE ANAPTOMORPHINE PRIMATE ABSAROKIUS (OMOMYIDAE) AND A DISCUSSION ABOUT ITS ADAPTIVE PROFILE [J].
COVERT, HH ;
HAMRICK, MW .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 1993, 25 (05) :351-362