Chemo-embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with different sizes of embolization particles

被引:48
作者
Amesur, Nikhil B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zajko, Albert B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Carr, Brian I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Liver Tumor Program, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
chemo-embolization; embolization particle sizes; unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-007-9995-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the size responses and vascular responses to three different sizes of Embosphere (EMBS) embolization particles used for chemo-embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Forty-seven patients with biopsy proven HCC treated with TACE using EMBS (Biosphere Medical, Rockland, MA, USA) were included in this study. EMBS are non-resorbable tris-acryl gelatin defined-size microspheres. Sixteen patients were treated with 40-120 micron (40-mu m), 13 patients with 100-300 (100-mu m), and 18 patients with 300-500 (300-mu m) EMBS particles. We measured the two-dimensional area and vascularity of the tumor index lesion on initial and subsequent CTs after treatment. Lesions were classified into four grades based on the degree of vascularity measured in 25% increments. Size of tumor after one treatment decreased by an average (avg) of 18% for 40-120-mu m particles, 38% for 100-300-mu m particles, and 17% for 300-500-mu m particles. After three treatments, size decreased by an avg of 46% for 40-120-mu m particles, 76% for 100-300-mu m particles, and 46% for 300-500-mu m particles. Vascularity decrease was also measured after the first and third treatments, and defined as a decrease of one or more grades in tumor vascularity. Results were as follows (% of patients with decrease). For 40-120-mu m particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 53% and 88% of patients. For 100-300-mu m particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 60% and 88% of patients. For 300-500-mu m particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 50% and 57% of patients. It was concluded the 100-300-mu m EMBS particles produce slightly higher responses.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1404
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
BREEDIS C, 1954, AM J PATHOL, V30, P969
[2]
Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Cammà, C ;
Schepis, F ;
Orlando, A ;
Albanese, M ;
Shahied, L ;
Trevisani, F ;
Andreone, P ;
Craxì, A ;
Cottone, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :47-54
[3]
HEPATIC-ARTERY EMBOLIZATION IN THE TREATMENT OF HEPATIC NEOPLASMS [J].
CHUANG, VP ;
WALLACE, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 140 (01) :51-58
[4]
Staging and current treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Clark, HP ;
Carson, WF ;
Kavanagh, PV ;
Ho, CPH ;
Shen, P ;
Zagoria, RJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 :S3-S24
[5]
Evaluation of responses to chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Ebied, OM ;
Federle, MP ;
Carr, BI ;
Pealer, KM ;
Li, W ;
Amesur, N ;
Zajko, A .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (04) :1042-1050
[6]
Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States [J].
El-Serag, HB ;
Mason, AC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10) :745-750
[7]
Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Ganne-Carrié, N ;
Trinchet, JC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 16 (03) :275-281
[8]
Chemoembolization of hepatic neoplasms: Safety, complications, and when to worry [J].
Gates, J ;
Hartnell, GG ;
Stuart, KE ;
Clouse, ME .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (02) :399-414
[9]
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of liver tumors: Effects of embolization protocol on injectable volume of chemotherapy and subsequent arterial patency [J].
Geschwind, JFH ;
Ramsey, DE ;
Cleffken, B ;
van der Wal, BCH ;
Kobeiter, H ;
Juluru, K ;
Hartnell, GG ;
Choti, MA .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (02) :111-117
[10]
TRANSCATHETER OCCLUSION OF ABDOMINAL TUMORS [J].
GOLDSTEIN, HM ;
WALLACE, S ;
ANDERSON, JH ;
BREE, RL ;
GIANTURCO, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1976, 120 (03) :539-545