Phase II Trial of Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Chemoradiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced (T4) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation of Smad4(Dpc4) Immunostaining With Pattern of Disease Progression

被引:231
作者
Crane, Christopher H. [1 ]
Varadhachary, Gauri R.
Yordy, John S.
Staerkel, Gregg A.
Javle, Milind M.
Safran, Howard [2 ]
Haque, Waqar [3 ]
Hobbs, Bridgett D.
Krishnan, Sunil
Fleming, Jason B.
Das, Prajnan
Lee, Jeffrey E.
Abbruzzese, James L.
Wolff, Robert A.
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Oncol Grp, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; ONCOLOGY-GROUP; CANCER; CARCINOMA; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMBINATION; RADIATION; THERAPY; GERCOR;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2010.33.8038
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin followed by cetuximab, capecitabine, and radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and Methods Treatment-naive eligible patients (n = 69) received intravenous gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks for four doses, followed by radiation (50.4 Gy to the gross tumor only) with concurrent capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) twice daily on radiation treatment days). Cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) was started on day 1 of chemotherapy and was continued every 2 weeks during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Diagnostic cytology specimens were immunostained for Smad4(Dpc4) expression. Results Median overall survival time was 19.2 months (95% CI, 14.2 to 24.2 months), and 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year actuarial overall survival rates were 66.0%, 25.02%, and 11.3%, respectively. Acneiform rash correlated with improved survival (P = .001), but initial CA19-9, borderline resectable initial stage, and surgical resection (n = 7) did not. The 1-year and 2-year radiographic local progression rates were 22.8% and 61.0%, respectively. The worst acute toxic effects were GI toxicity (32% and 10% for grades 2 and 3, respectively); fatigue (26% and 6% for grades 2 and 3, respectively); sensory neuropathy (9% and 1% for grades 2 and 3, respectively); and acneiform rash (54% and 3% for grades 2 and 3, respectively). Smad4(Dpc4) expression correlated with a local rather than a distant dominant pattern of disease progression (P = .016). Conclusion This regimen appears effective and has acceptable toxicity. The primary end point (1-year overall survival rate > 45%) was met, with encouraging survival duration. Smad4(Dpc4) immunostaining correlated with the pattern of disease progression. Prospective validation of Smad4(Dpc4) expression in cytology specimens as a predictive biomarker is warranted and may lead to personalized treatment strategies for patients with localized pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3037 / 3043
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S15
[2]   Smad4 is dispensable for normal pancreas development yet critical in progression and tumor biology of pancreas cancer [J].
Bardeesy, Nabeel ;
Cheng, Kuang-hung ;
Berger, Justin H. ;
Chu, Gerald C. ;
Pahler, Jessica ;
Olson, Peter ;
Hezel, Aram F. ;
Horner, James ;
Lauwers, Gregory Y. ;
Hanahan, Douglas ;
DePinho, Ronald A. .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 20 (22) :3130-3146
[3]  
Bonner JA, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p489S
[4]   Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.: Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study [J].
Chauffert, B. ;
Mornex, F. ;
Bonnetain, F. ;
Rougier, P. ;
Mariette, C. ;
Bouche, O. ;
Bosset, J. F. ;
Aparicio, T. ;
Mineur, L. ;
Azzedine, A. ;
Hammel, P. ;
Butel, J. ;
Stremsdoerfer, N. ;
Maingon, P. ;
Bedenne, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (09) :1592-1599
[5]   Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Humblet, Y ;
Siena, S ;
Khayat, D ;
Bleiberg, H ;
Santoro, A ;
Bets, D ;
Mueser, M ;
Harstrick, A ;
Verslype, C ;
Chau, I ;
Van Cutsem, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (04) :337-345
[6]  
EVANS DB, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P1335
[7]   Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies [J].
Huguet, Florence ;
Andre, Thierry ;
Hammel, Pascal ;
Artru, Pascal ;
Balosso, Jacques ;
Selle, Frederic ;
Deniaud-Alexandre, Elisabeth ;
Ruszniewski, Philippe ;
Touboul, Emmanuel ;
Labianca, Roberto ;
de Gramont, Aimery ;
Louvet, Christophe .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (03) :326-331
[8]   Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Qualitative Systematic Review [J].
Huguet, Florence ;
Girard, Nicolas ;
Seblain-El Guerche, Clotilde ;
Hennequin, Christophe ;
Mornex, Francoise ;
Azria, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (13) :2269-2277
[9]   DPC4 Gene Status of the Primary Carcinoma Correlates With Patterns of Failure in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A. ;
Fu, Baojin ;
Yachida, Shinichi ;
Luo, Mingde ;
Abe, Hisashi ;
Henderson, Clark M. ;
Vilardell, Felip ;
Wang, Zheng ;
Keller, Jesse W. ;
Banerjee, Priya ;
Herman, Joseph M. ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Halushka, Marc K. ;
Eshleman, James R. ;
Raben, Marian ;
Klein, Alison P. ;
Hruban, Ralph H. ;
Hidalgo, Manuel ;
Laheru, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (11) :1806-1813
[10]   Induction chemotherapy selects patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer for optimal benefit from consolidative chemoradiation therapy [J].
Krishnan, Sunil ;
Rana, Vishal ;
Janjan, Nora A. ;
Varadhachary, Gauri R. ;
Abbruzzese, James L. ;
Das, Prajnan ;
Delclos, Marc E. ;
Gould, Morris S. ;
Evans, Douglas B. ;
Wolff, Robert A. ;
Crane, Christopher H. .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (01) :47-55