Power of in silico QTL mapping from phenotypic, pedigree, and marker data in a hybrid breeding program

被引:29
作者
Yu, J [1 ]
Arbelbide, M [1 ]
Bernardo, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Agron & Plant Genet, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00122-005-1926-7
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Most quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping studies in plants have used designed mapping populations. As an alternative to traditional QTL mapping, in silico mapping via a mixed-model approach simultaneously exploits phenotypic, genotypic, and pedigree data already available in breeding programs. The statistical power of this in silico mapping method, however, remains unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the power of in silico mapping via a mixed-model approach in hybrid crops. We used maize (Zea mays L.) as a model species to study, by computer simulation, the influence of number of QTLs ( 20 or 80), heritability ( 0.40 or 0.70), number of markers ( 200 or 400), and sample size ( 600 or 2,400 hybrids). We found that the average power to detect QTLs ranged from 0.11 to 0.59 for a significance level of alpha = 0.01, and from 0.01 to 0.47 for alpha = 0.0001. The false discovery rate ranged from 0.22 to 0.74 for alpha = 0.01, and from 0.05 to 0.46 for alpha = 0.0001. As with designed mapping experiments, a large sample size, high marker density, high heritability, and small number of QTLs led to the highest power for in silico mapping via a mixed-model approach. The power to detect QTLs with large effects was greater than the power to detect QTL with small effects. We conclude that gene discovery in hybrid crops can be initiated by in silico mapping. Finding an acceptable compromise, however, between the power to detect QTL and the proportion of false QTL would be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1067
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, P 49 ANN CORN SORGHU
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]  
Bernardo R, 1996, CROP SCI, V36, P50, DOI [10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600010009x, 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040007x, 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040009x]
[4]   What proportion of declared QTL in plants are false? [J].
Bernardo, R .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2004, 109 (02) :419-424
[5]  
Bernardo R, 1998, CSSA SPEC PUBL, P117
[6]  
DeLacy I. H., 1990, GENOTYPE ENV INTERAC, P287
[7]  
DOERGE RW, 1994, ANAL MOL MARKER DATA, P15
[8]   SYSTEMATIC PROCEDURES FOR CALCULATING INBREEDING COEFFICIENTS [J].
EMIK, LO ;
TERRILL, CE .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1949, 40 (02) :51-55
[9]   Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests [J].
Fernando, RL ;
Nettleton, D ;
Southey, BR ;
Dekkers, JCM ;
Rothschild, MF ;
Soller, M .
GENETICS, 2004, 166 (01) :611-619
[10]   Finding genes that underlie complex traits [J].
Glazier, AM ;
Nadeau, JH ;
Aitman, TJ .
SCIENCE, 2002, 298 (5602) :2345-2349