OBJECTIVES We sought to study exercise capacity at different points in time after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and subsequent heart transplantation (HTx). BACKGROUND The lack of donor organs warrants alternatives for transplantation. METHODS Repeat treadmill testing with respiratory gas analysis was performed in 15 men with a LVAD. Four groups of data are presented. In group A (n = 10), the exercise capacities at 8 weeks and 12 weeks after LVAD implantation were compared. In group B (n = 15), the data at 12 weeks are presented in more detail. In group C (n = 9), sequential analysis of exercise capacity was performed at 12 weeks after LVAD implantation and at 12 weeks and one year after HTx. In group D, exercise performance one year after HTx in patients with (n = 10) and without (n = 20) a previous assist device was compared. RESULTS In group A, peak oxygen consumption ((V) over dot o(2),) increased from 21.3 +/- 3.8 to 24.2 +/- 4.8 ml/kg body weight per min (p < 0.003), accompanied by a decrease in peak minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production ((V) over dot E/(V) over dot co(2),) (39.4 +/- 10.1 to 36.3 +/- 8.2; p < 0.03). In group B, peak (V) over dot o(2) 12 weeks after LVAD implantation was 23.0 +/- 4.4 ml/kg per min. In group C, levels of peak (V) over dot o(2) 12 weeks after LVAD implantation and 12 weeks and one year after HTx were comparable (22.8 +/- 5.3, 24.6 +/- 3.3 and 26.2 +/- 3.8 ml/kg per min, respectively; p = NS). In group D, there appeared to be no difference in percent predicted peak (V) over dot o(2) in patients with or without a previous LVAD (68 +/- 13% vs. 74 +/- 15%; p < 0.37), although, because of the small numbers, the power of this comparison is limited (0.45 to detect a difference of 10%). CONCLUSIONS Exercise capacity in patients with a LVAD increases over time; 12 weeks after LVAD implantation, (V) over dot o(2) is comparable to that at 12 weeks and one year after HTx. Previous LVAD implantation does not seem to adversely affect exercise capacity after HTx. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1794-9) (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.