Shoulder and arm problems after radiotherapy for primary breast cancer

被引:29
作者
Deutsch, M [1 ]
Flickinger, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2001年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
axillary dissection; breast cancer; breast irradiation; lumpectomy; lymphedema; radiotherapy complications;
D O I
10.1097/00000421-200104000-00015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There is little, if any, difference in disease-free or overall survival for patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated by either breast conservation therapy or mastectomy. With either treatment, there may be cosmetic and functional problems related to arm edema, limited shoulder motion, and shoulder Fin. The extent to which factors such as surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and patient characteristics affect development of arm edema, limited shoulder motion, and shoulder pain is not well documented. We undertook a prospective study of arm edema, limited shoulder motion, and shoulder pain in every patient (N = 331) seen during a 6-month period for follow-up after radiotherapy postlumpectomy or mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Local treatment incIuded lumpec- tomy and breast irradiation with (n = 232) or without (n = 97) axillary dissection. Ten other women underwent mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. Doses to each region treated were -50 Gy in 25 fractions. The operative area was treated with an additional 1.000 Gy in approximately 60% of patients. Twelve patients received axillary irradiation without axillary dissection, and 11 patients received supraclavicular irradiation. Chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen was used in 71 patients and tamoxifen alone was used in 150 patients. One hundred ten patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Ipsilateral arm edema occurred in 20 women (6.0%), limited ipsilateral shoulder motion in 5 (1.5%), and ipsilateral shoulder pain in 5 (1.5%). Edema was mild (1+) in 15 patients and moderate (2+) in five patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk of arm edema was significantly increased in black women (p = 0.005, 4/18 versus 16/313 whites) and with mastectomy (p = 0.048, 2/10 versus 18/321 with lumpectomy). There is a low incidence of arm edema, decreased range of motion of the ipsilateral shoulder, and shoulder-arm pain in patients undergoing postlumpectomy or postmastectomy radiotherapy. The risk of arm edema is increased in black women and in patients after mastectomy as apposed to lumpectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 176
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   8-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY AND LUMPECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FISHER, B ;
REDMOND, C ;
POISSON, R ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
WOLMARK, N ;
WICKERHAM, L ;
FISHER, E ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
CAPLAN, R ;
PILCH, Y ;
GLASS, A ;
SHIBATA, H ;
LERNER, H ;
TERZ, J ;
SIDOROVICH, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (13) :822-828
[2]   INCIDENCE OF ARM SWELLING FOLLOWING AXILLARY CLEARANCE FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
HOE, AL ;
IVEN, D ;
ROYLE, GT ;
TAYLOR, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (03) :261-262
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF MORBIDITY FROM COMPLETE AXILLARY DISSECTION [J].
IVENS, D ;
HOE, AL ;
PODD, TJ ;
HAMILTON, CR ;
TAYLOR, I ;
ROYLE, GT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 66 (01) :136-138
[4]   RISK OF LYMPHEDEMA FOLLOWING THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
KISSIN, MW ;
DELLAROVERE, GQ ;
EASTON, D ;
WESTBURY, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (07) :580-584
[5]   EDEMA OF THE ARM AS A FUNCTION OF THE EXTENT OF AXILLARY SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE I-II CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST TREATED WITH PRIMARY RADIOTHERAPY [J].
LARSON, D ;
WEINSTEIN, M ;
GOLDBERG, I ;
SILVER, B ;
RECHT, A ;
CADY, B ;
SILEN, W ;
HARRIS, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (09) :1575-1582
[6]   ARM EDEMA IN CONSERVATIVELY MANAGED BREAST-CANCER - OBESITY IS A MAJOR PREDICTIVE FACTOR [J].
WERNER, RS ;
MCCORMICK, B ;
PETREK, J ;
COX, L ;
CIRRINCIONE, C ;
GRAY, JR ;
YAHALOM, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (01) :177-184