Does global inequality matter?

被引:50
作者
Beitz, CR [1 ]
机构
[1] Bowdoin Coll, Dept Govt, Brunswick, ME 04011 USA
关键词
inequality; hunger; poverty; deprivation; humiliation; self-control; unfairness; exclusion;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9973.00177
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Global economic and political inequalities are in most respects greater today than they have been for decades. From one point of view inequality is a bad thing simply because it involves a deviation from equality, which is thought to have value for its own sake. But it is controversial whether this position can be defended, and if it can, whether the egalitarian ideal on which the defense may depend applies at the global level as in individual societies. Setting aside directly egalitarian reasons for concern about global inequality, this paper explores several reasons for concern that derive from nonegalitarian values primarily those associated with poverty and material deprivation, humiliation, the impact of inequality on the capacity for self-control and self-government, and the unfairness of political decision-making procedures with large economic inequalities in the background.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 112
页数:18
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NOMOS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, TANNER LECT HUMAN VA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights
[4]  
Beitz Charles., 1989, Political Equality
[5]   Rawls's Law of Peoples [J].
Beitz, CR .
ETHICS, 2000, 110 (04) :669-696
[6]  
Doyle Michael W., 2000, Principled World Politics: The Challenge of Normative International Relations, P79
[7]  
Dworkin Ronald., 2000, Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality
[8]   EQUALITY AS A MORAL IDEAL [J].
FRANKFURT, H .
ETHICS, 1987, 98 (01) :21-43
[9]  
Frankfurt H., 1999, Necessity, volition and love
[10]   ASIA DIFFERENT STANDARD [J].
KAUSIKAN, B .
FOREIGN POLICY, 1993, (92) :24-41