Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: Survey of United States Transplant Centers

被引:272
作者
Matas, AJ
Bartlett, ST
Leichtman, AB
Delmonico, FL
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Surg, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
kidney donor; morbidity; mortality;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00126.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
There have been two recent trends in living kidney donation: increased acceptance of living donors and increased acceptance of laparoscopic nephrectomy (L-N). We surveyed 234 UNOS-listed kidney transplant programs to determine current living donor morbidity and mortality for open nephrectomy, hand-assisted LN, and non-hand-assisted LN. Of the 234 centers, 171 (73%) responded. Between 1/1/1999 and 7/1/2001, these centers carried out 10828 living donor nephrectomies: 52.3% open, 20.7% hand-assisted LN, and 27% non-hand-assisted LN. Two donors (0.02%) died from surgical complications and one is in a persistent vegetative state (all after LN). Reoperation was necessary in 22 (0.4%) open, 23 (1.0%) hand-assisted LN, and 21 (0.9%) non-hand-assisted LN cases (p=0.001). Complications not requiring reoperation were reported for 19 (0.3%) open, 22 (1.0%) hand-assisted LN, and 24 (0.8%) non-hand-assisted LN cases (p=0.02). Readmission rate was higher for LN (1.6%) vs. open (0.6%) donors (p<0.001), almost entirely as a result of an increase in gastrointestinal complications in LN donors. Morbidity and mortality for living donor nephrectomy at transplant centers in the United States remain low. We provide current data from which comprehensive informed consent can be obtained from donors.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 834
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Abecassis M, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V284, P2919
[2]   EVALUATION OF LIVING RENAL DONORS - THE CURRENT PRACTICE OF US TRANSPLANT CENTERS [J].
BIA, MJ ;
RAMOS, EL ;
DANOVITCH, GM ;
GASTON, RS ;
HARMON, WE ;
LEICHTMAN, AB ;
LUNDIN, PA ;
NEYLAN, J ;
KASISKE, BL .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (04) :322-327
[3]  
Cecka J M, 2001, Clin Transpl, P1
[4]   Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplant [J].
Cosio, FG ;
Alamir, A ;
Yim, S ;
Pesavento, TE ;
Falkenhain, ME ;
Henry, ML ;
Elkhammas, EA ;
Davies, EA ;
Bumgardner, GL ;
Ferguson, RM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 53 (03) :767-772
[5]  
ELLISON MD, 2002, AM J TRANSPLANT S3, V2, P226
[6]   Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Flowers, JL ;
Jacobs, S ;
Cho, E ;
Morton, A ;
Rosenberger, WF ;
Evans, D ;
Imbembo, AL ;
Bartlett, ST .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) :483-489
[7]   Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy [J].
Johnson, EM ;
Remucal, MJ ;
Gillingham, KJ ;
Dahms, RA ;
Najarian, JS ;
Matas, AJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (08) :1124-1128
[8]   LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF REDUCED RENAL MASS IN HUMANS [J].
KASISKE, BL ;
MA, JZ ;
LOUIS, TA ;
SWAN, SK .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 48 (03) :814-819
[9]   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys - A center-specific microeconomic analysis [J].
Kuo, PC ;
Johnson, LB .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (10) :2211-2213
[10]   Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors. [J].
Mange, KC ;
Joffe, MM ;
Feldman, HI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (10) :726-731