WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
被引:1645
作者:
Christian, Michael S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Org Behav Dept, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USAUniv N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Org Behav Dept, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
Christian, Michael S.
[1
]
Garza, Adela S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Coll Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USAUniv N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Org Behav Dept, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
Garza, Adela S.
[2
]
Slaughter, Jerel E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Tucson, AZ 85721 USAUniv N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Org Behav Dept, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
Slaughter, Jerel E.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Org Behav Dept, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Coll Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Many researchers have concerns about work engagement's distinction from other constructs and its theoretical merit. The goals of this study were to identify an agreed-upon definition of engagement, to investigate its uniqueness, and to clarify its nomological network of constructs. Using a conceptual framework based on Macey and Schneider (2008; Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30), we found that engagement exhibits discriminant validity from, and criterion related validity over, job attitudes. We also found that engagement is related to several key antecedents and consequences. Finally, we used meta-analytic path modeling to test the role of engagement as a mediator of the relation between distal antecedents and job performance, finding support for our conceptual framework. In sum, our results suggest that work engagement is a useful construct that deserves further attention.