Who treats whom? An application of the Pathways to Care model in Australia

被引:11
作者
Issakidis, C [1 ]
Andrews, G
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychiat, Policy & Epidemiol Grp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] St Vincents Hosp, WHO, Collaborating Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
ambulatory care; inpatients; mental health services; private sector;
D O I
10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01746.x
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The present paper applies Goldberg and Huxley's Pathways to Care (PTC) model to the Australian health-care system to ask: who is treated in each sector and what does this tell us about the performance of the health-care system ? It examines the factors associated with reaching primary care, outpatient and inpatient sectors, as well as private and public mental health services. Method: Data from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing were used to determine the proportion of the population treated in each sector. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were examined and logistic regression was used to determine which factors were associated with use of different sectors of care. Results: Of the total population, 80.5% reached primary care, 8.2% primary care for mental health problems, 6.5% outpatient care and 0.4% reached the mental health inpatient sector. Clinical severity increased across these sectors and was an important determinant of access to care. Those consulting private practitioners were clinically similar to those consulting in the public sector. Sociodemographic characteristics were important determinants of access to primary, specialist and private mental health care. Being aged over 55 years or living in a rural area was associated with lower access to several sectors. Conclusions: Although at a broad level the health-care system is performing as expected, limited access among some groups is cause for concern. Applying the PTC model to a population sample offered useful insights into the performance of the Australian health-care system.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 86
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Accessibility and pathways to psychiatric care in a community-based mental health system [J].
Amaddeo, F ;
Zambello, F ;
Tansella, M ;
Thornicroft, G .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (10) :500-507
[2]  
ANDREWS G, 1989, AM J PSYCHIAT, V146, P881
[3]   THE WORK OF AUSTRALIAN PSYCHIATRISTS, CIRCA 1986 [J].
ANDREWS, G ;
HADZIPAVLOVIC, D .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 22 (02) :153-165
[4]   Shortfall in mental health service utilisation [J].
Andrews, G ;
Issakidis, C ;
Carter, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 179 :417-425
[5]  
Andrews G, 2001, MED J AUSTRALIA, V175, pS48
[6]   Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation - Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey [J].
Andrews, G ;
Henderson, S ;
Hall, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 :145-153
[7]   Unequal access and unmet need: neurotic disorders and the use of primary care services [J].
Bebbington, PE ;
Meltzer, H ;
Brugha, TS ;
Farrell, M ;
Jenkins, R ;
Ceresa, C ;
Lewis, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (06) :1359-1367
[8]  
Blitz C L, 2001, Ment Health Serv Res, V3, P25, DOI 10.1023/A:1010108418256
[9]   Disability, outcome and case-mix in acute psychiatric in-patient units [J].
Boot, B ;
Hall, W ;
Andrews, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 171 :242-246
[10]   General practice encounters for psychological problems in rural, remote and metropolitan areas in Australia [J].
Caldwell, TM ;
Jorm, AF ;
Knox, S ;
Braddock, D ;
Dear, KBG ;
Britt, H .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 38 (10) :774-780