Understanding US addiction physicians' low rate of naltrexone prescription

被引:102
作者
Mark, TL
Kranzler, HR
Song, X
机构
[1] Medstat Grp, Washington, DC 20008 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[3] Medstat, Santa Barbara, CA 93111 USA
关键词
naltrexone; alcohol dependence; alcoholism treatment; prescribing patterns;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00134-0
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Naltrexone was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 1994. Although it is one of only two medications for alcohol rehabilitation approved in the US, naltrexone is not frequently prescribed. This paper examines the factors limiting physicians' use of naltrexone. Data were collected through a survey of US physician members of two addiction medicine professional associations. Logistic regression analysis was conducted with the dependent variable being any prescription of naltrexone. Independent variables consisted of physician practice characteristics, physician ratings of naltrexone's attributes (e.g. efficacy), physicians' patient characteristics, and physicians' exposure to information about naltrexone. On average, addiction medicine physicians prescribed naltrexone to 13% of their alcoholism patients. The two main self-reported reasons why physicians did not prescribe the medication to more patients were that patients refused to take the medication or comply with prescribing regimes (23%), and that patients could not afford the medication (21%). Multivariate results indicated that physician perceptions of naltrexone's effectiveness and safety were significantly associated with prescribing. Physicians who had more exposure to information about the product (e.g. by reading more journal articles about naltrexone) were more likely to prescribe it. In summary, multiple factors are contributing to the relatively low naltexone prescription rate. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 228
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Armstrong D, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P949
[2]  
BERNDT ER, 1999, NAT BUREAU EC RES WO
[3]   PHYSICIANS BEHAVIOR AND THEIR INTERACTIONS WITH DRUG COMPANIES - A CONTROLLED-STUDY OF PHYSICIANS WHO REQUESTED ADDITIONS TO A HOSPITAL DRUG FORMULARY [J].
CHREN, MM ;
LANDEFELD, CS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (09) :684-689
[4]  
Coleman J.S., 1966, Medical innovations: A diffusion study
[5]   RATIONAL PRESCRIBING AND INTERPRACTITIONER VARIATION - A MULTILEVEL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, P ;
GRIBBEN, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1995, 11 (03) :428-442
[6]   HOW PHYSICIANS CHOOSE DRUGS [J].
DENIG, P ;
HAAIJER-RUSKAMP, FM ;
ZIJSLING, DH .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (12) :1381-1386
[7]   PHYSICIAN BELIEFS, ATTITUDES, AND PRESCRIBING BEHAVIOR FOR ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS [J].
EPSTEIN, AM ;
READ, JL ;
WINICKOFF, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 77 (02) :313-318
[8]  
FUHRER MJ, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P167
[9]   Pharmacological treatment of alcohol dependence - A review of the evidence [J].
Garbutt, JC ;
West, SL ;
Carey, TS ;
Lohr, KN ;
Crews, FT .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (14) :1318-1325
[10]   New pharmacotherapies for alcohol dependence [J].
Graham, R ;
Wodak, AD ;
Whelan, G .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 177 (02) :103-107