p53 and mdm2 as prognostic indicators in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer:: A multivariate analysis

被引:29
作者
Dogan, E
Saygili, U [1 ]
Tuna, B
Gol, M
Gürel, D
Acar, B
Koyuncuoglu, M
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Pathol, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
epithelial ovarian cancer; p53; mdm2; prognosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.12.053
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic significance of p53 and mdm2 protein expressions in epithelial ovarian cancer and their relationship with the clinicopathological variables. Methods. Tumor biopsy specimens from 82 patients who were homogenously treated were examined immunohistochemically for expression of p53 and mdm2 proteins. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for prognostic factors, and correlations with clinicopathological parameters were examined. Results. Fifty-four percent and 33% of cases stained positive for p53 and mdm2, respectively. p53 expression was associated with serous type, higher grade, positive cytology, residual tumor and stage of the disease. rndm2 expression predicted of chemosensitivity and it was related with higher grade but not with other clinicopathological variables. Significantly poorer survival was seen for those with p53 (P < 0.05) or mdm2 (P < 0.01) positive tumors than those with negative p53 or mdm2 staining. Coexpression of p53 and mdm2 was also related to poor outcome (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that FIGO stage, mdm2 expression, response to chemotherapy and optimal cytoreduction were significant independent prognostic and predictive factors of survival. Conclusion. Although our findings showed that mdm2 may be used as a prognostic indicator in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, these results should be supported by more and larger studies. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 52
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Ovarian cancer: Strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Kaye, SB .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2003, 3 (07) :502-516
[2]   The prognostic significance of p53 expression quantitated by computerized image analysis in epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Anttila, MA ;
Ji, HX ;
Juhola, MT ;
Saarikoski, SV ;
Syrjänen, KJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 18 (01) :42-51
[3]   IMPLICATIONS OF THE P53 TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR GENE IN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY [J].
CHANG, FJ ;
SYRJANEN, S ;
SYRJANEN, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (04) :1009-1022
[4]  
Chène P, 2004, MOL CANCER RES, V2, P20
[5]   DNA amplifications 20q13 and MDM2 define distinct subsets of evolved breast and ovarian tumours [J].
Courjal, F ;
Cuny, M ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Louason, G ;
Speiser, P ;
Katsaros, D ;
Tanner, MM ;
Zeillinger, R ;
Theillet, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 74 (12) :1984-1989
[6]  
Eltabbakh GH, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P892
[7]   MDM2 OVEREXPRESSION IS RARE IN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA IRRESPECTIVE OF TP53 MUTATION STATUS [J].
FOULKES, WD ;
STAMP, GWH ;
AFZAL, S ;
LALANI, N ;
MCFARLANE, CP ;
TROWSDALE, J ;
CAMPBELL, IG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 72 (04) :883-888
[8]  
Friedlander ML, 1998, SEMIN ONCOL, V25, P305
[9]   Quantification of p53 in epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Geisler, JP ;
Geisler, HE ;
Wiemann, MC ;
Givens, SS ;
Zhou, Z ;
Miller, GA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 66 (03) :435-438
[10]  
Ginath S, 2001, INT J ONCOL, V18, P1133