A study of inter-lab and inter-platform agreement of DNA microarray data

被引:43
作者
Wang, HX
He, XM
Band, M
Wilson, C
Liu, L
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, WM Keck Ctr Comparat & Funct Genom, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Stat, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-6-71
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
As gene expression profile data from DNA microarrays accumulate rapidly, there is a natural need to compare data across labs and platforms. Comparisons of microarray data can be quite challenging due to data complexity and variability. Different labs may adopt different technology platforms. One may ask about the degree of agreement we can expect from different labs and different platforms. To address this question, we conducted a study of inter-lab and inter-platform agreement of microarray data across three platforms and three labs. The statistical measures of consistency and agreement used in this paper are the Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation, kappa coefficients, and a measure of intra-transcript correlation. The three platforms used in the present paper were Affymetrix GeneChip, custom cDNA arrays, and custom oligo arrays. Using the within-platform variability as a benchmark, we found that these technology platforms exhibited an acceptable level of agreement, but the agreement between two technologies within the same lab was greater than that between two labs using the same technology. The consistency of replicates in each experiment varies from lab to lab. When there is high consistency among replicates, different technologies show good agreement within and across labs using the same RNA samples. On the other hand, the lab effect, especially when confounded with the RNA sample effect, plays a bigger role than the platform effect on data agreement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [2] Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis -: art. no. 59
    Culhane, AC
    Perrière, G
    Higgins, DG
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 4 (1)
  • [3] Durbin B P, 2002, Bioinformatics, V18 Suppl 1, pS105
  • [4] Huber P. J., 1981, ROBUST STAT
  • [5] Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data
    Irizarry, RA
    Hobbs, B
    Collin, F
    Beazer-Barclay, YD
    Antonellis, KJ
    Scherf, U
    Speed, TP
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2003, 4 (02) : 249 - 264
  • [6] Are data from different gene expression microarray platforms comparable?
    Järvinen, AK
    Hautaniemi, S
    Edgren, H
    Auvinen, P
    Saarela, J
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Monni, O
    [J]. GENOMICS, 2004, 83 (06) : 1164 - 1168
  • [7] Microarray results: how accurate are they?
    Kothapalli, R
    Yoder, SJ
    Mane, S
    Loughran, TP
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 3 (1)
  • [8] Analysis of matched mRNA measurements from two different microarray technologies
    Kuo, WP
    Jenssen, TK
    Butte, AJ
    Ohno-Machado, L
    Kohane, IS
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 18 (03) : 405 - 412
  • [9] Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: Expression index computation and outlier detection
    Li, C
    Wong, WH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [10] Differential gene expression patterns revealed by oligonucleotide versus long cDNA arrays
    Li, J
    Pankratz, M
    Johnson, JA
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 69 (02) : 383 - 390