Shifting Winds: Explaining Variation in State Policies to Promote Small-Scale Wind Energy

被引:39
作者
Wiener, Joshua G. [1 ,2 ]
Koontz, Tomas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, John Glenn Sch Publ Affairs, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
state policy; environmental policy; energy policy; policy adoption; policy diffusion; ADOPTION; DIFFUSION; FRAMEWORK; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00377.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
States have increasingly taken leading roles in U.S. environmental policymaking over the past two decades. As laboratories of democracy, states have developed different levels and mixes of policies to address climate change, nonpoint source pollution, alternative energy, and other challenging environmental issues. Policy scholars have sought to explain variation in state environmental policy through two primary theoretical lenses: internal determinants and regional diffusion. While our understanding of state environmental policy adoption has grown to identify which variables are most important, less is known about how these variables interact in particular states to influence policy adoption. This study examines the interactions of variables from both theories to explain how state policies for small-scale wind energy promotion were adopted in three U.S. states. Our results highlight the nuanced role of citizen ideology, which may be important in contexts at either end of the ideological spectrum but less important in the middle-where economic development is more critical. Results also indicate that interstate competition may be over environmental as well as economic leadership. Interestingly, strength of the wind resource is not necessarily correlated with policy adoption for small-scale wind energy promotion.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 651
页数:23
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
ADAMCZAK R, 2009, DAILY REPORTER 0106
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, AWEA Small Wind Turbine Global Market Study
[3]  
*AWEA, 2008, POL PROM SMALL WIND
[4]   State expenditures and policy outcomes in environmental program management [J].
Bacot, AH ;
Dawes, RA .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1997, 25 (03) :355-370
[5]   The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses [J].
Bell, D ;
Gray, T ;
Haggett, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2005, 14 (04) :460-477
[6]   Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93 [J].
Berry, WD ;
Ringquist, EJ ;
Fording, RC ;
Hanson, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (01) :327-348
[7]  
BERRY WD, 2007, AM J POLITICAL SCI
[8]  
Bowman AM., 1986, The Resurgence of the States
[9]  
*BUR EC AN, 2008, GROSS DOM PROD STAT
[10]   American policy conflict in the greenhouse: Divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy [J].
Byrne, John ;
Hughes, Kristen ;
Rickerson, Wilson ;
Kurdgelashvili, Lado .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (09) :4555-4573